[jira] Resolved: (INFRA-531) CVS revisions are getting lost!

["Jeff Turner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-531?page=all ]
     
Jeff Turner resolved INFRA-531:
-------------------------------

    Resolution: Cannot Reproduce

Let's hope it was a once-off server problem then.. closing the issue.

> CVS revisions are getting lost!
> -------------------------------
>
>          Key: INFRA-531
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-531
>      Project: Infrastructure
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: CVS
>     Reporter: Howard M. Lewis Ship
>     Priority: Blocker

>
> I thought something odd was going, that I had messed up somehow on my end when this happened a day or two ago.
> I then deleted and re-checked out my workspace.
> However, this morning I noticed that a file I had changed last night, and checked in, was out of date, as if my change never made it.
> I checked my local CVS log (inside Eclipse):
>     More commits to come...
>     Checking in framework/src/test/org/apache/tapestry/form/TestForm.java;
>     /home/cvs/jakarta-tapestry/framework/src/test/org/apache/tapestry/form/TestForm.java,v  <--  TestForm.java
>     new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1
> But if you view the history of the file:
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tapestry/framework/src/test/org/apache/tapestry/form/TestForm.java
> You'll see that only the 1.1 revision exists
> Here's the commit email that CVS sent:
> Index: TestForm.java
>  ===================================================================
>  RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-tapestry/framework/src/test/org/apache/tapestry/form/TestForm.java,v
>  retrieving revision 1.1
>  retrieving revision 1.2
>  diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
>  --- TestForm.java     17 Jun 2005 16:52:19 -0000      1.1
>  +++ TestForm.java     25 Aug 2005 23:34:19 -0000      1.2
>  @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>   import org.apache.tapestry.IActionListener;
>   import org.apache.tapestry.components.BaseComponentTestCase;
>  +import org.apache.tapestry.valid.IValidationDelegate;
>  +import org.easymock.MockControl;
>   /**
>    * Tests for {@link org.apache.tapestry.form.Form}. Most of the testing is, still alas, done with
>  @@ -88,19 +90,54 @@
>           verifyControls();
>       }
>  -    public void testFindListenerNormal()
>  +    public void testFindListenerSuccess()
>       {
>           IActionListener cancel = newListener();
>           IActionListener refresh = newListener();
>  +        IActionListener success = newListener();
>           IActionListener listener = newListener();
>  +        IValidationDelegate delegate = newDelegate(false);
>  +
>  +        replayControls();
>  +
>  +        Form form = (Form) newInstance(Form.class, new Object[]
>  +        { "delegate", delegate, "success", success, "cancel", cancel, "refresh", refresh,
>  +                "listener", listener });
>  +
>  +        assertSame(success, form.findListener(FormConstants.SUBMIT_NORMAL));
>  +
>  +        verifyControls();
>  +    }
>  +
>  +    public void testFindListenerValidationErrors()
>  +    {
>  +        IActionListener cancel = newListener();
>  +        IActionListener refresh = newListener();
>  +        IActionListener success = newListener();
>  +        IActionListener listener = newListener();
>  +
>  +        IValidationDelegate delegate = newDelegate(true);
>  +
>           replayControls();
>           Form form = (Form) newInstance(Form.class, new Object[]
>  -        { "listener", listener, "cancel", cancel, "refresh", refresh });
>  +        { "delegate", delegate, "success", success, "cancel", cancel, "refresh", refresh,
>  +                "listener", listener });
>           assertSame(listener, form.findListener(FormConstants.SUBMIT_NORMAL));
>           verifyControls();
>       }
>  +
>  +    private IValidationDelegate newDelegate(boolean hasErrors)
>  +    {
>  +        MockControl control = newControl(IValidationDelegate.class);
>  +        IValidationDelegate delegate = (IValidationDelegate) control.getMock();
>  +
>  +        delegate.getHasErrors();
>  +        control.setReturnValue(hasErrors);
>  +
>  +        return delegate;
>  +    }
>   }
> So ... what happened to my 1.1 revision?
> This is scary!  What other code that I've checked in has gotten lost?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira