You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by 怀守昆 <hu...@sina.com> on 2017/06/16 12:31:28 UTC

回复：Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication

Is Artemis replication asynchronously or synchronized ?

It's not very clear in user manual.

But in code replication packet is not send blocking, so live and backup is not strong consistent.

Am i right ?


Thanks


----- 原始邮件 -----
发件人：Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
收件人：users@activemq.apache.org
主题：Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication
日期：2017年06月07日 21点53分

Performance over replication is only due to network latencies.
There is a wish at the moment.  But I am not aware of planning yet. It will
happen but I don't know when yet.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:51 AM praneethg <pr...@concur.com>
wrote:
> Are you planning to include ZooKeeper integration pretty soon? Any
> timeline?
> And would that improve performance over replication?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-HA-cluster-with-replication-tp4725734p4727132.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic

Re: 回复：Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication

Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
> Am i right?

I can't verify you're right because I'm not clear on what you're asserting.  If you're suggesting that there is a possibility of message loss because the live doesn't ensure the backup received the data before it responds to the client then you're not right.  If you're suggesting something else please clarify.

The subject of asynchronous vs. synchronous replication has already been dealt with on the forum here [1].


Justin

[1] http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Replication-and-client-transactions-td4722207.html

----- Original Message -----
From: "怀守昆" <hu...@sina.com>
To: "users" <us...@activemq.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 7:31:28 AM
Subject: 回复：Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication

Is Artemis replication asynchronously or synchronized ?

It's not very clear in user manual.

But in code replication packet is not send blocking, so live and backup is not strong consistent.

Am i right ?


Thanks


----- 原始邮件 -----
发件人：Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
收件人：users@activemq.apache.org
主题：Re: Artemis HA cluster with replication
日期：2017年06月07日 21点53分

Performance over replication is only due to network latencies.
There is a wish at the moment.  But I am not aware of planning yet. It will
happen but I don't know when yet.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:51 AM praneethg <pr...@concur.com>
wrote:
> Are you planning to include ZooKeeper integration pretty soon? Any
> timeline?
> And would that improve performance over replication?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Artemis-HA-cluster-with-replication-tp4725734p4727132.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
-- 
Clebert Suconic