You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@commons.apache.org by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com> on 2004/08/21 11:18:10 UTC
[VOTE] JEXL and a release
At the moment, I'm adding some tests for code coverage and adding some
documentation ( as outlined on the wiki ) for the JEXL release.
In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an
Release Candidate.
[ ] Release Candidate
[ ] Beta Release
I'm +1 on the RC.
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Jacob Kjome <ho...@visi.com>.
Quoting Geoff Waggott <ge...@webartjapan.com>:
> Hi Jake,
>
> Maybe transformation is the wrong word... DOM aware templating? I'm only
> concerned with producing a manipulated copy of a template document
> rather than translating between XML dialects.
>
Ok, that makes more sense.
> Transfomations/DOM manipulations are specified by a simple XML-based
> language (probably a misuse of XML, but hey it's easy to parse).
> Elements in the target are referenced in the transformation by their id.
> JEXL is used to extract data from the java data object model to put into
> the transformed result. I use it unsurprisingly to present dynamic web
> pages.
>
Do you have a presentation template, such as XHTML and then apply the rules
defined in XML file containing your new custom language? So, basically, it is
DOM based without the DOM programming?
> OK almost completely unlike XMLC, but it was inspired by XMLC, along
> with Zope Page Templates and XSLT. If my boss lets me and people think
> that there's a need for yet another web presentation technology we may
> open source it.
>
Yes, I'd certainly be interested in see it. Please let me know when/if you
release it as open source!
Jake
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
> Jacob Kjome wrote:
>
> > At 10:52 AM 8/24/2004 +0900, you wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
> >
> >
> > Just curious, how is it "XMLC-like"? You mean...
> > http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/xmlc/
> >
> > Or were you referring to something different? It seems like it since
> > XMLC is not an XML transformation library, at least not as I think of
> > the word "transformation". Anyway, just wondering.
> >
> > Jake
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Geoff Waggott <ge...@webartjapan.com>.
Hi Jake,
Maybe transformation is the wrong word... DOM aware templating? I'm only
concerned with producing a manipulated copy of a template document
rather than translating between XML dialects.
Transfomations/DOM manipulations are specified by a simple XML-based
language (probably a misuse of XML, but hey it's easy to parse).
Elements in the target are referenced in the transformation by their id.
JEXL is used to extract data from the java data object model to put into
the transformed result. I use it unsurprisingly to present dynamic web
pages.
OK almost completely unlike XMLC, but it was inspired by XMLC, along
with Zope Page Templates and XSLT. If my boss lets me and people think
that there's a need for yet another web presentation technology we may
open source it.
Cheers,
Geoff
Jacob Kjome wrote:
> At 10:52 AM 8/24/2004 +0900, you wrote:
>
>> I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
>
>
> Just curious, how is it "XMLC-like"? You mean...
> http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/xmlc/
>
> Or were you referring to something different? It seems like it since
> XMLC is not an XML transformation library, at least not as I think of
> the word "transformation". Anyway, just wondering.
>
> Jake
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
This looks like a bug in the grammar, in that size is always followed by "(".
I've added a commented out assertion to the test cases, and an extra
check to ensure getSize() works.
I'd rather leave the grammar changes, such as this to post 1.0.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:22:45 -0500, Jacob Kjome <ho...@visi.com> wrote:
> At 10:52 AM 8/24/2004 +0900, you wrote:
> >I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
>
> Just curious, how is it "XMLC-like"? You mean...
> http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/xmlc/
>
> Or were you referring to something different? It seems like it since XMLC
> is not an XML transformation library, at least not as I think of the word
> "transformation". Anyway, just wondering.
>
> Jake
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Jacob Kjome <ho...@visi.com>.
At 10:52 AM 8/24/2004 +0900, you wrote:
>I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
Just curious, how is it "XMLC-like"? You mean...
http://forge.objectweb.org/projects/xmlc/
Or were you referring to something different? It seems like it since XMLC
is not an XML transformation library, at least not as I think of the word
"transformation". Anyway, just wondering.
Jake
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
Yep, fixed that one in CVS. Should be in tonights binary.
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 12:34:18 +0900, Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi again Dion,
>
> Actually I'm a bit confused about by this.
>
> In the course of writing the test program for the size problem I wrote
> tests for the string concatenation as well and they worked. In my tests
> for the my library using JEXL it doesn't. I am wrapping the JexlContext
> to hide the dependency on JEXL (in case I make the expression language
> puggable later). Using my wrapping class in a simple test program it
> still works!!!
>
> I'll investigate further and try the latest version of JEXL from CVS.
>
> The exception I get in the tests for my product looks like this:
> Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "Testing"
> at
> java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
> at
> java.lang.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(FloatingDecimal.java:1213)
> at java.lang.Double.valueOf(Double.java:184)
> at java.lang.Double.<init>(Double.java:259)
> at
> org.apache.commons.jexl.util.Coercion.coerceDouble(Coercion.java:122)
> at
> org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTAddNode.value(ASTAddNode.java:83)
> at
> org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTExpression.value(ASTExpression.java:47)
> at
> org.apache.commons.jexl.ExpressionImpl.evaluate(ExpressionImpl.java:83)
>
> Anyway thanks again for your quick action on this.
>
> Geoff
>
> Dion Gillard wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:28 +0900, Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
> >>Overall it seems very stable. There are a couple issues I've come across:
> >>- The overloaded + string concatenation operator only seems to work for
> >>string literals.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >The above bug was fixed and a test case added to ensure it stays fixed :-)
>
>
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> ===========================================================
> Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com>
> ZergSoft
> Tel: (052) 930-7790
> FAX: (052) 930-7791
> email: geoff@zergsoft.com
> www.zergsoft.com
> ===========================================================
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com>.
Hi again Dion,
Actually I'm a bit confused about by this.
In the course of writing the test program for the size problem I wrote
tests for the string concatenation as well and they worked. In my tests
for the my library using JEXL it doesn't. I am wrapping the JexlContext
to hide the dependency on JEXL (in case I make the expression language
puggable later). Using my wrapping class in a simple test program it
still works!!!
I'll investigate further and try the latest version of JEXL from CVS.
The exception I get in the tests for my product looks like this:
Caused by: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "Testing"
at
java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:48)
at
java.lang.FloatingDecimal.readJavaFormatString(FloatingDecimal.java:1213)
at java.lang.Double.valueOf(Double.java:184)
at java.lang.Double.<init>(Double.java:259)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.util.Coercion.coerceDouble(Coercion.java:122)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTAddNode.value(ASTAddNode.java:83)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ASTExpression.value(ASTExpression.java:47)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.ExpressionImpl.evaluate(ExpressionImpl.java:83)
Anyway thanks again for your quick action on this.
Geoff
Dion Gillard wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:28 +0900, Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
>>Overall it seems very stable. There are a couple issues I've come across:
>>- The overloaded + string concatenation operator only seems to work for
>>string literals.
>>
>>
>
>The above bug was fixed and a test case added to ensure it stays fixed :-)
>
>
>
--
===========================================================
Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com>
ZergSoft
Tel: (052) 930-7790
FAX: (052) 930-7791
email: geoff@zergsoft.com
www.zergsoft.com
===========================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:28 +0900, Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
> Overall it seems very stable. There are a couple issues I've come across:
> - The overloaded + string concatenation operator only seems to work for
> string literals.
The above bug was fixed and a test case added to ensure it stays fixed :-)
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com>.
Hi Dion,
Thanks for your quick response!
Here's a small test program that exhibits the size problem.
import java.io.*;
import org.apache.commons.jexl.*;
import java.util.*;
public class JexlTest {
public static class Product {
public Product() {
}
public int getSize() {
return 1;
}
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws
Exception
{
JexlContext context = JexlHelper.createContext();
context.getVars().put("p", new Product());
System.out.println(ExpressionFactory.createExpression("p.getSize()").evaluate(context));
System.out.println(ExpressionFactory.createExpression("p.size").evaluate(context));
}
}
The two expressions should be equivalent I think, but the second results
in the following exception:
Exception in thread "main"
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.ParseException: Encountered ";" at line
1, column 7.
Was expecting:
"(" ...
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.generateParseException(Parser.java:3274)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.jj_consume_token(Parser.java:3158)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.SizeMethod(Parser.java:1864)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.Reference(Parser.java:1912)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.PrimaryExpression(Parser.java:1345)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.UnaryExpression(Parser.java:1325)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.MultiplicativeExpression(Parser.java:1046)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.AdditiveExpression(Parser.java:970)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.RelationalExpression(Parser.java:726)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.EqualityExpression(Parser.java:594)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.AndExpression(Parser.java:554)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.ExclusiveOrExpression(Parser.java:514)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.InclusiveOrExpression(Parser.java:474)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.ConditionalAndExpression(Parser.java:398)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.ConditionalOrExpression(Parser.java:322)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.Expression(Parser.java:262)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.ExpressionExpression(Parser.java:1548)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.Statement(Parser.java:1522)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.JexlScript(Parser.java:58)
at org.apache.commons.jexl.parser.Parser.parse(Parser.java:17)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.ExpressionFactory.createNewExpression(ExpressionFactory.java:116)
at
org.apache.commons.jexl.ExpressionFactory.createExpression(ExpressionFactory.java:94)
at JexlTest.main(JexlTest.java:22)
Dion Gillard wrote:
>On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:28 +0900, Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>[snip]
>
>
>>I've just tested these using the latest binary drop 2004/08/23. For some
>>reason the jar file in this distribution is still labelled as beta-1,
>>whereas the javadoc on the web site is for beta-3. Where do I obtain a
>>beta-3 distribution to test against?
>>
>>
>
>Hi Geoff,
>
>if you've grabbed the nightly binary build, the beta-1 label is a
>misnomer. It really is beta3.
>
>I'm fixing that now too.
>
>
That clears that up then :-)
Thanks again,
Geoff
--
===========================================================
Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com>
ZergSoft
Tel: (052) 930-7790
FAX: (052) 930-7791
email: geoff@zergsoft.com
www.zergsoft.com
===========================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:28 +0900, Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
[snip]
> I've just tested these using the latest binary drop 2004/08/23. For some
> reason the jar file in this distribution is still labelled as beta-1,
> whereas the javadoc on the web site is for beta-3. Where do I obtain a
> beta-3 distribution to test against?
Hi Geoff,
if you've grabbed the nightly binary build, the beta-1 label is a
misnomer. It really is beta3.
I'm fixing that now too.
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:52:28 +0900, Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
Cool.
> Overall it seems very stable. There are a couple issues I've come across:
> - The overloaded + string concatenation operator only seems to work for
> string literals.
I just created a test for that and it fails. Will look into it.
> - The in-built size method interferes with any size property or method
> defined on the object being referenced.
Can you give us some examples to formulate a test case?
> I've just tested these using the latest binary drop 2004/08/23. For some
> reason the jar file in this distribution is still labelled as beta-1,
Where did you get the distribution?
> whereas the javadoc on the web site is for beta-3. Where do I obtain a
> beta-3 distribution to test against?
You can build it from CVS.
> In addition I'd like to make the following feature requests:
> - Being able to call methods on literals
This is worth looking into as long as it doesn't change the grammar.
> - A ternary ? operator
Hmmm...I'm loathe to change the grammar for the release. This sounds
like a 1.1 feature.
> Anyway my vote goes for another beta with the above issues outstanding.
> [ ] Release Candidate
> [X] Beta Release
Thanks Geoff!
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com>.
Hi,
I'm using JEXL in a XMLC-like XML transformation library I'm writing.
Overall it seems very stable. There are a couple issues I've come across:
- The overloaded + string concatenation operator only seems to work for
string literals.
- The in-built size method interferes with any size property or method
defined on the object being referenced.
I've just tested these using the latest binary drop 2004/08/23. For some
reason the jar file in this distribution is still labelled as beta-1,
whereas the javadoc on the web site is for beta-3. Where do I obtain a
beta-3 distribution to test against?
In addition I'd like to make the following feature requests:
- Being able to call methods on literals
- A ternary ? operator
What would the "strict-mode" be for?
Anyway my vote goes for another beta with the above issues outstanding.
[ ] Release Candidate
[X] Beta Release
Regards,
Geoff
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I think people using Jexl outside of Jelly should speak here.
> Peter ?
>
> paul
>
> PS: Dion, is there some documentation somewhere about a "strict-mode"
> for Jexl which someone offered as a patch about four months ago ?
>
>
> Le 21 août 04, à 11:18, Dion Gillard a écrit :
>
>> In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an
>> Release Candidate.
>
> [X] Release Candidate
> [ ] Beta Release
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
--
===========================================================
Geoff Waggott <ge...@zergsoft.com>
ZergSoft
Tel: (052) 930-7790
FAX: (052) 930-7791
email: geoff@zergsoft.com
www.zergsoft.com
===========================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
Dion,
I thought this was non-affecting in the sense that it just added things
that were conditional to a flag which was, by default, disabled.
Yes, I think it would be nice to come into the release, if, indeed, it
is as such.
I thought it was in.
paul
Le 23 août 04, à 01:20, Dion Gillard a écrit :
> Paul,
>
> did you want the 'strict-mode' patch to go into 1.0?
>
> I'd rather we kept 1.0 to the original functionality, and added new
> stuff with a 1.1 release.
>
>
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:03:36 +0200, Paul Libbrecht
> <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
>> I think people using Jexl outside of Jelly should speak here.
>> Peter ?
>>
>> paul
>>
>> PS: Dion, is there some documentation somewhere about a "strict-mode"
>> for Jexl which someone offered as a patch about four months ago ?
>>
>> Le 21 août 04, à 11:18, Dion Gillard a écrit :
>>
>>> In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an
>>> Release Candidate.
>> [X] Release Candidate
>> [ ] Beta Release
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
Paul,
did you want the 'strict-mode' patch to go into 1.0?
I'd rather we kept 1.0 to the original functionality, and added new
stuff with a 1.1 release.
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:03:36 +0200, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> I think people using Jexl outside of Jelly should speak here.
> Peter ?
>
> paul
>
> PS: Dion, is there some documentation somewhere about a "strict-mode"
> for Jexl which someone offered as a patch about four months ago ?
>
> Le 21 août 04, à 11:18, Dion Gillard a écrit :
>
> > In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an
> > Release Candidate.
> [X] Release Candidate
> [ ] Beta Release
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
None I know of... I'd need to go search the archives.
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 22:03:36 +0200, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> I think people using Jexl outside of Jelly should speak here.
> Peter ?
>
> paul
>
> PS: Dion, is there some documentation somewhere about a "strict-mode"
> for Jexl which someone offered as a patch about four months ago ?
>
> Le 21 août 04, à 11:18, Dion Gillard a écrit :
>
> > In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an
> > Release Candidate.
> [X] Release Candidate
> [ ] Beta Release
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
I think people using Jexl outside of Jelly should speak here.
Peter ?
paul
PS: Dion, is there some documentation somewhere about a "strict-mode"
for Jexl which someone offered as a patch about four months ago ?
Le 21 août 04, à 11:18, Dion Gillard a écrit :
> In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an
> Release Candidate.
[X] Release Candidate
[ ] Beta Release
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
+0 on the RC.
Quoting Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>:
> At the moment, I'm adding some tests for code coverage and adding some
> documentation ( as outlined on the wiki ) for the JEXL release.
>
> In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an
> Release Candidate.
>
> [ ] Release Candidate
> [ ] Beta Release
>
> I'm +1 on the RC.
> --
> http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JEXL and a release
Posted by peter royal <pr...@apache.org>.
On Aug 21, 2004, at 5:18 AM, Dion Gillard wrote:
> In the meantime, I suggest we issue either a new beta release or an
> Release Candidate.
>
> [ ] Release Candidate
> [ ] Beta Release
[X] Release Candidate.
-pete
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org