You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Mark Eichin <ei...@gmail.com> on 2008/12/01 04:41:09 UTC

Re: reverse blame to find deleted lines?

http://nedbatchelder.com/code/utilities/blameall_py.html

is the tool I was talking about (didn't have a chance to dig it up
from my phone when I first responded.)

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Mark Eichin <ei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Blameall.py should get you the "lifespan" of all lines that ever existed,
> which is more than you're asking for; I don't have a link handy, but Ned
> Batchelder wrote it, should be enough to find it...
>
> On Nov 28, 2008 9:51 AM, "Kloster Oddvar" <Od...@sintef.no> wrote:
>
>> I know you can use the blame function to detect in what revision a
>> particular line of code has been added or changed.
>>
>> But is there a way to detect in what revision lines have been _removed_?
>> I tried a reverse blame like
>>  svn blame -r 200:100 myfile.c
>> to see deleted lines, but svn does not allow that:
>>  svn: Start revision must precede end revision
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Norbert
>>
>
> I found the above message from 2005 when searching for this. I too find from
> time to time that I'd like to discover when a line next was changed or
> deleted *after* a certain revision. Does svn now have any support for this,
> or are there plans for implenting reverse blame?
>
>
> Oddvar Kloster
>
>



-- 
_Mark_ <ei...@thok.org> <ei...@gmail.com>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: reverse blame to find deleted lines?

Posted by B Smith-Mannschott <bs...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Mark Eichin <ei...@gmail.com> wrote:

> http://nedbatchelder.com/code/utilities/blameall_py.html
>
> is the tool I was talking about (didn't have a chance to dig it up
> from my phone when I first responded.)
>
>
Aha! That answers my question from March 17th. That's the script I had seen,
as looking for, and couldn't find anymore. ;-)

// Ben Smith-Mannschott