You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Greg Hudson <gh...@MIT.EDU> on 2004/04/26 20:12:27 UTC
Re: svn commit: r9487 - in
branches/fs-abstraction/subversion: libsvn_fs libsvn_fs_baseline
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 16:02, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Well, I don't know if I particularly like building infrastructure for
> theoretical new backends for the fs library, but hey, I'm not the one
> doing the work.
Since there's already some care taken in libsvn_fs to separate out most
of the BDB-specific parts, I think it would create a mess to start using
"svn_fs_bdb" as a library prefix for symbols there.
(Also, the only FSP infrastructure being built here is in the new name
choice for the existing FS implementation.)
> I'd also say that 'libsvn_fs_base' would be nicer than
> 'libsvn_fs_baseline', to stress that it's a sort of 'base class' for
> other db based implementations to extend. I'm not sure what exactly
> 'baseline' indicated to me when I first saw it, but it wasn't that.
I was just following gat's document. I can rename it to "base" if no
one disagrees. If nothing else, it will eliminate the need to use "bl"
as an abbreviation, which always seemed terribly opaque to me.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: r9487 - in branches/fs-abstraction/subversion: libsvn_fs
libsvn_fs_baseline
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@collab.net>.
Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 16:02, Garrett Rooney wrote:
...
>>I'd also say that 'libsvn_fs_base' would be nicer than
>>'libsvn_fs_baseline', to stress that it's a sort of 'base class' for
>>other db based implementations to extend. I'm not sure what exactly
>>'baseline' indicated to me when I first saw it, but it wasn't that.
>
> I was just following gat's document. I can rename it to "base" if no
> one disagrees. If nothing else, it will eliminate the need to use "bl"
> as an abbreviation, which always seemed terribly opaque to me.
I would prefer "base" to "baseline". I agree that the "bl" abbreviation isn't
entirely obvious.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: r9487 - in branches/fs-abstraction/subversion: libsvn_fs
libsvn_fs_baseline
Posted by "Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net>.
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:12, Greg Hudson wrote:
>
>
>
>>I was just following gat's document. I can rename it to "base" if no
>>one disagrees. If nothing else, it will eliminate the need to use "bl"
>>as an abbreviation, which always seemed terribly opaque to me.
>>
>>
>
>+1. Please do.
>
>
Sounds good to me.
gat
Re: svn commit: r9487 - in
branches/fs-abstraction/subversion: libsvn_fs libsvn_fs_baseline
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 15:12, Greg Hudson wrote:
> I was just following gat's document. I can rename it to "base" if no
> one disagrees. If nothing else, it will eliminate the need to use "bl"
> as an abbreviation, which always seemed terribly opaque to me.
+1. Please do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org