You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Stefan Zauchenberger <st...@yahoo.com> on 2004/02/19 01:21:25 UTC
Fwd: Perl version
Am I practicing bad list-iquette? Or does *no one*
have any input/assistance on this scenario? Somone
please enlighten/validate...?
>
> Can anyone advise me on this?
>
> The customers machine has two instances of Perl, one
> "real" one (for system purposes) and an updated
> version (5.8) in /home/spam-filter - along with SA.
>
> perl -e 'print @INC;' shows the following output:
>
>
/usr/lib/perl5/5.00503/i386-linux/usr/lib/perl5/5.00503/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-linux/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005.
>
> Yet, MailScanner is using the SA and Perl in
> /home/spam-filter. How is this done and how can be
> sure not to break it when upgrading SA?
>
> TIA,
>
> Stefan
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
Re: Fwd: Perl version
Posted by Bart Schaefer <sc...@zanshin.com>.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Stefan Zauchenberger wrote:
> Am I practicing bad list-iquette? Or does *no one*
> have any input/assistance on this scenario? Somone
> please enlighten/validate...?
I replied, off-list, to your inquiry, which was also off-list (maybe you
didn't mean for it to be?). You sent me two messages, one of which was
exactly the message you just excerpted, and I replied to both.
Did you not get my reply? It would have had subject "several messages"
(gee, thanks, Pine).