You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by pangea <ya...@gmail.com> on 2010/03/24 19:58:55 UTC
what stax implementation is being used by cxf?
I kind of have a feeling that it is using sjsxp? I need some confirnation
pls. also is there a way to configure the stax implementation to be used.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/what-stax-implementation-is-being-used-by-cxf--tp28019722p28019722.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: what stax implementation is being used by cxf?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 11:52:31 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> Is there a reason why CXF ships with Woodstox 3.x instead of 4.x?
Mostly just to not mess with deps on the branch. Trunk (2.3) has switched to
4.x already.
Dan
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:25
> > To: users@cxf.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: what stax implementation is being used by cxf?
> >
> > We use woodstox until told otherwise. To tell us otherwise, put
> > something else in classpath.
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:58 PM, pangea <ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I kind of have a feeling that it is using sjsxp? I need some
> >
> > confirnation
> >
> > > pls. also is there a way to configure the stax implementation to be
> >
> > used.
> >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/what-stax-
> >
> > implementation-is-being-used-by-cxf--tp28019722p28019722.html
> >
> > > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
RE: what stax implementation is being used by cxf?
Posted by Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com>.
Is there a reason why CXF ships with Woodstox 3.x instead of 4.x?
Thank you,
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:25
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: what stax implementation is being used by cxf?
>
> We use woodstox until told otherwise. To tell us otherwise, put
> something else in classpath.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:58 PM, pangea <ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I kind of have a feeling that it is using sjsxp? I need some
> confirnation
> > pls. also is there a way to configure the stax implementation to be
> used.
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/what-stax-
> implementation-is-being-used-by-cxf--tp28019722p28019722.html
> > Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
Re: what stax implementation is being used by cxf?
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
We use woodstox until told otherwise. To tell us otherwise, put
something else in classpath.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:58 PM, pangea <ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I kind of have a feeling that it is using sjsxp? I need some confirnation
> pls. also is there a way to configure the stax implementation to be used.
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/what-stax-implementation-is-being-used-by-cxf--tp28019722p28019722.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>