You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2009/10/03 19:46:58 UTC
[2.x] JSON-RPC Binding Availability
The JSON-RPC Binding basic functionality is now available in 2.x code
base. I have also added basic support for JSON-RPC References, and we
can have two pojos getting wired using the JSON-RPC binding. Next,
I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework.
Please let me know if you find issues or have any questions.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [2.x] JSON-RPC Binding Availability
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:05 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Next,
>>> I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework.
>>>
>>
>> How about updating to Jackson instead of Jabsorb? We already use
>> Jackson in the JSONP binding in 2.x, it seems much more up to date and
>> designed for what we need in Tuscany.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
> I had a quick look at jackson, does that have support for JSON-RPC or
> just JSON ?
>
>
Right, it handles just the JSON part, we'd have to layer the rest of
the protocol on top of that. Not such a big deal though and a similar
thing as we already do in the binding for the SMD support.
...ant
Re: [2.x] JSON-RPC Binding Availability
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:05 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Next,
>> I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework.
>>
>
> How about updating to Jackson instead of Jabsorb? We already use
> Jackson in the JSONP binding in 2.x, it seems much more up to date and
> designed for what we need in Tuscany.
>
> ...ant
>
I had a quick look at jackson, does that have support for JSON-RPC or
just JSON ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [2.x] JSON-RPC Binding Availability
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Next,
> I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework.
>
How about updating to Jackson instead of Jabsorb? We already use
Jackson in the JSONP binding in 2.x, it seems much more up to date and
designed for what we need in Tuscany.
...ant
Re: [2.x] JSON-RPC Binding Availability
Posted by Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org>.
Luciano Resende wrote:
> The JSON-RPC Binding basic functionality is now available in 2.x code
> base. I have also added basic support for JSON-RPC References, and we
> can have two pojos getting wired using the JSON-RPC binding. Next,
> I'll look into upgrading to the latest JSON-RPC Jabsorb framework.
>
> Please let me know if you find issues or have any questions.
>
Great! I'll try it out. I've just started to play with JSON-RPC too in
CPP, it shouldn't be too difficult to interop that way.
--
Jean-Sebastien