You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by sebb <se...@gmail.com> on 2013/12/04 17:41:07 UTC

Re: Big mess in 2.0

On 29 November 2013 03:03, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le 11/28/13 10:27 PM, sebb a écrit :
>> If it should become necessary to mark a branch read-only, I would
>> suggest the following:
>>
>> Rename it as a tag; that's effectively what it has become - tags
>> should be immutable.
>
> Certainly not a tag. A tag is a released version.

That is only a convention.

> I'd rather move the branch to a "deceased" sub-folder if necessary.

Branches are expected to be mutable.

>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>

Re: Big mess in 2.0

Posted by Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com>.

Le 12/4/13 5:41 PM, sebb a écrit :
> On 29 November 2013 03:03, Emmanuel Lécharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Le 11/28/13 10:27 PM, sebb a écrit :
>>> If it should become necessary to mark a branch read-only, I would
>>> suggest the following:
>>>
>>> Rename it as a tag; that's effectively what it has become - tags
>>> should be immutable.
>> Certainly not a tag. A tag is a released version.
> That is only a convention.

Yes, this is the MINA project's convention.


-- 
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com