You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org> on 2007/07/24 00:20:56 UTC
[VOTE] Release 0.13.1 (candidate 1)
I've created another candidate build for Hadoop 0.13.1. This
incorporates HADOOP-1396 , which, as Nigel noted, was missing the first
time around.
http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.13.1-candidate-1/
Should we release this one?
Doug
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.13.1 (candidate 1)
Posted by Tom White <to...@gmail.com>.
+1
Based on some small scale testing on Linux and Mac OS X.
Tom
On 23/07/07, Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've created another candidate build for Hadoop 0.13.1. This
> incorporates HADOOP-1396 , which, as Nigel noted, was missing the first
> time around.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.13.1-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this one?
>
> Doug
>
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.13.1 (candidate 1)
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
+1
The following benchmark jobs pass on cluster sizes of 20, 100, 500
and 900:
- TestDFSIO
- MRBench (aka SmallJobs)
- NNBench (had some issues which I believe were not related to hadoop)
- Sort (RandomWriter, Sort, SortValidation with speculative execution)
Cheers,
Nige
On Jul 23, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> I've created another candidate build for Hadoop 0.13.1. This
> incorporates HADOOP-1396 , which, as Nigel noted, was missing the
> first time around.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.13.1-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this one?
>
> Doug
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.13.1 (candidate 1)
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
I'd say the theme for this release is fixing critical bugs in DFS
(the non DFS bugs are all in contrib/ec2). HADOOP-1193 has a
temporary work-around (which perhaps should be documented on the bug)
by turning off map out compression. So -1 for including HADOOP-1193
to 0.13.1.
Cheers,
Nige
On Jul 24, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> Should we also include the patch for hadoop-1193 in this?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Cutting [mailto:cutting@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:51 AM
> To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release 0.13.1 (candidate 1)
>
> I've created another candidate build for Hadoop 0.13.1. This
> incorporates
> HADOOP-1396 , which, as Nigel noted, was missing the first time
> around.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.13.1-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this one?
>
> Doug
>
RE: [VOTE] Release 0.13.1 (candidate 1)
Posted by Devaraj Das <dd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Should we also include the patch for hadoop-1193 in this?
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Cutting [mailto:cutting@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 3:51 AM
To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release 0.13.1 (candidate 1)
I've created another candidate build for Hadoop 0.13.1. This incorporates
HADOOP-1396 , which, as Nigel noted, was missing the first time around.
http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.13.1-candidate-1/
Should we release this one?
Doug
Re: [VOTE] Release 0.13.1 (candidate 1)
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
+1 from me, which makes three in 72 hours. I'll push it out today.
Doug Cutting wrote:
> I've created another candidate build for Hadoop 0.13.1. This
> incorporates HADOOP-1396 , which, as Nigel noted, was missing the first
> time around.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~cutting/hadoop-0.13.1-candidate-1/
>
> Should we release this one?
>
> Doug