You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@drill.apache.org by "Aman Sinha (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/25 18:42:12 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (DRILL-4693) Incorrect column ordering when
CONVERT_FROM() json is used
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Aman Sinha reassigned DRILL-4693:
---------------------------------
Assignee: Aman Sinha
> Incorrect column ordering when CONVERT_FROM() json is used
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DRILL-4693
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-4693
> Project: Apache Drill
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Execution - Relational Operators, Query Planning & Optimization
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Reporter: Aman Sinha
> Assignee: Aman Sinha
>
> For the following query, the column order in the results is wrong..it should be col1, col2, col3.
> {noformat}
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> select 'abc' as col1, convert_from('{"x" : "y"}', 'json') as col2, 'xyz' as col3 from cp.`tpch/region.parquet`;
> +-------+-------+------------+
> | col1 | col3 | col2 |
> +-------+-------+------------+
> | abc | xyz | {"x":"y"} |
> | abc | xyz | {"x":"y"} |
> | abc | xyz | {"x":"y"} |
> | abc | xyz | {"x":"y"} |
> | abc | xyz | {"x":"y"} |
> +-------+-------+------------+
> {noformat}
> The EXPLAIN plan:
> {noformat}
> 0: jdbc:drill:zk=local> explain plan for select 'abc' as col1, convert_from('{"x" : "y"}', 'json') as col2, 'xyz' as col3 from cp.`tpch/region.parquet`;
> +------+------+
> | text | json |
> +------+------+
> | 00-00 Screen
> 00-01 Project(col1=['abc'], col2=[CONVERT_FROMJSON('{"x" : "y"}')], col3=['xyz'])
> 00-02 Scan(groupscan=[ParquetGroupScan [entries=[ReadEntryWithPath [path=classpath:/tpch/region.parquet]], selectionRoot=classpath:/tpch/region.parquet, numFiles=1, usedMetadataFile=false, columns=[]]])
> {noformat}
> This happens on current master branch as well as 1.6.0 and even earlier (I checked 1.4.0 as well which also has the same behavior). So it is a pre-existing bug.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)