[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12054) bad state after NamespaceUpgrade with reserved table names

["Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14145015#comment-14145015 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-12054:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12670739/HBASE-12054-0.98.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12670739

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 8 new or modified tests.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/11035//console

This message is automatically generated.

> bad state after NamespaceUpgrade with reserved table names
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12054
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12054
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.96.2, 0.99.0, 0.98.6.1
>            Reporter: Matteo Bertozzi
>            Assignee: Matteo Bertozzi
>             Fix For: 1.0.0, 0.98.7
>
>         Attachments: HBASE-12054-0.98.patch, HBASE-12054-branch1.patch, HBASE-12054-trunk.patch
>
>
> If 94 has a table called "data" NamespaceUpgrade will fail to bring that table up and the generated layout will be dirty with stuff like "/hbase/data/.data" and so on.
> (the reserved names that we have no longer apply in 96+ since the data is separate from the root dir)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)