You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by YingLisa <yz...@hotmail.com> on 2007/10/20 02:19:33 UTC

servicemix-http/jsr181-component doesn't fully work with SoapBinding parameterStyle.WRAPPED, only work for BARE

Hi All,

Has anybody used servicemix-http/jsr181-component pair (wsdl-first example)
with SoapBinding.parameterStyle=WRAPPED for multiple input parameters or
return value? 

I was trying to use this pair(just like the, GetPerson example in
wsdl-first) for multiple parameters input (such as string arg0, string arg1)
for a very simple service (basically a hello service, return = arg0 + arg1).
I got two errors: arg1 is missing in input(the first input is passed in) and
return is null. The client side is .Net client. instead of html. Does
anybody see why?

thanks,
Ying
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-http-jsr181-component-doesn%27t-fully-work-with-SoapBinding-parameterStyle.WRAPPED%2C-only-work-for-BARE-tf4656396s12049.html#a13305264
Sent from the ServiceMix - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Re: servicemix-http/jsr181-component doesn't fully work with SoapBinding parameterStyle.WRAPPED, only work for BARE

Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@skynet.be>.
Ying,

I haven't used this combination myself, but I would expect it to work.  
Could you provide us with some more detailed information (stack traces, 
sample xbean.xml and java files)?

Gert

YingLisa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Has anybody used servicemix-http/jsr181-component pair (wsdl-first example)
> with SoapBinding.parameterStyle=WRAPPED for multiple input parameters or
> return value? 
>
> I was trying to use this pair(just like the, GetPerson example in
> wsdl-first) for multiple parameters input (such as string arg0, string arg1)
> for a very simple service (basically a hello service, return = arg0 + arg1).
> I got two errors: arg1 is missing in input(the first input is passed in) and
> return is null. The client side is .Net client. instead of html. Does
> anybody see why?
>
> thanks,
> Ying
>