You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2014/08/30 09:01:20 UTC
rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Hi!
with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our numbers are somehow in sync with the spec.
What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
We did not do any release yet...
LieGrue,
strub
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
-1. Would have been great if 1.1 and 1.2 would have been aligned as well.
Id just do as tomcat now
Le 30 août 2014 08:01, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our numbers
> are somehow in sync with the spec.
>
> What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
> We did not do any release yet...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 for 2.0 for CDI 2.0
don't know about 1.5...
2014-08-30 16:16 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> tomcat does +1 on all major for each spec release (2.5 -> 6, 3.0 -> 7,
> 3.1 -> 8...)
>
> I don't like 1.5 cause it doesn't make any sense but I don't care
> enough about version to fight for it.
>
> Seems it passed Mark ;)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-08-30 14:20 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>:
> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >> What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
> >
> > +1, awfully confusing w/o it.
> >
> > --
> > Eric Covener
> > covener@gmail.com
>
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
tomcat does +1 on all major for each spec release (2.5 -> 6, 3.0 -> 7,
3.1 -> 8...)
I don't like 1.5 cause it doesn't make any sense but I don't care
enough about version to fight for it.
Seems it passed Mark ;)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-30 14:20 GMT+02:00 Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
>
> +1, awfully confusing w/o it.
>
> --
> Eric Covener
> covener@gmail.com
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
+1, awfully confusing w/o it.
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
+1
This is not because we did not do it that we can not try to do better.
>From a user point of view I also think it's easier
Le 30 août 2014 09:01, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our numbers
> are somehow in sync with the spec.
>
> What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
> We did not do any release yet...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
@mark:
+1 (that's what we are doing in myfaces as well and it's way easier for
users)
@romain:
i know what you mean, but we can keep it in sync with v2+
regards,
gerhard
2014-08-30 10:26 GMT+02:00 Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>:
> +1 for that
>
>
> Am 30.08.14 09:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <st...@yahoo.de>:
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our
> >numbers are somehow in sync with the spec.
> >
> >What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
> >We did not do any release yet...
> >
> >LieGrue,
> >strub
>
>
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Posted by Karl Kildén <ka...@gmail.com>.
What's the tomcat way? Disregard sync?
On 30 August 2014 10:26, Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de> wrote:
> +1 for that
>
>
> Am 30.08.14 09:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <st...@yahoo.de>:
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our
> >numbers are somehow in sync with the spec.
> >
> >What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
> >We did not do any release yet...
> >
> >LieGrue,
> >strub
>
>
Re: rename owb-2.0 to owb-1.5?
Posted by Arne Limburg <ar...@openknowledge.de>.
+1 for that
Am 30.08.14 09:01 schrieb "Mark Struberg" unter <st...@yahoo.de>:
>Hi!
>
>with the start of CDI-2.0 it would be much easier for users if our
>numbers are somehow in sync with the spec.
>
>What about renaming our current trunk to 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT?
>We did not do any release yet...
>
>LieGrue,
>strub