You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Matthew F. Dennis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/08/24 21:24:29 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CASSANDRA-3074
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
Project: Cassandra
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
Priority: Minor
The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
Posted by "Matthew F. Dennis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Matthew F. Dennis updated CASSANDRA-3074:
-----------------------------------------
Attachment: (was: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch)
> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.4
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
Posted by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jonathan Ellis updated CASSANDRA-3074:
--------------------------------------
Affects Version/s: (was: 0.8.4)
> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
Posted by "Matthew F. Dennis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Matthew F. Dennis updated CASSANDRA-3074:
-----------------------------------------
Attachment: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.4
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
Posted by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13091038#comment-13091038 ]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-3074:
-------------------------------------------
the proposed changes conflate the index entries themselves (always one per key) and the sampling rate (which is what index_interval affects).
> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.4
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
Posted by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13091296#comment-13091296 ]
Hudson commented on CASSANDRA-3074:
-----------------------------------
Integrated in Cassandra-0.8 #295 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Cassandra-0.8/295/])
clarify index_interval explanation
patch by mdennis for CASSANDRA-3074
jbellis : http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1161701
Files :
* /cassandra/branches/cassandra-0.8/conf/cassandra.yaml
> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.8.5
>
> Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
Posted by "Matthew F. Dennis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Matthew F. Dennis updated CASSANDRA-3074:
-----------------------------------------
Attachment: (was: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch)
> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.4
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
Posted by "Matthew F. Dennis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Matthew F. Dennis updated CASSANDRA-3074:
-----------------------------------------
Attachment: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.4
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-3074) comments and documentation for
index_interval are misleading
Posted by "Matthew F. Dennis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Matthew F. Dennis updated CASSANDRA-3074:
-----------------------------------------
Attachment: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
poor choice of words on my part. new version attached.
> comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3074
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3074
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.8.4
> Reporter: Matthew F. Dennis
> Assignee: Matthew F. Dennis
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: 3074-cassandra-0.8.patch
>
>
> The comments and documentation for index_interval are misleading. They state the larger the *sampling* the more effective the index as at the cost of space. This is true, but in the context of the configuration variable it implies the larger the *setting* is the larger the index is while in fact it's the opposite of that.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira