You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@logging.apache.org by rp...@apache.org on 2016/05/09 17:33:10 UTC

logging-log4j2 git commit: LOG4J2-1297 added text to synchronous file logging response time section

Repository: logging-log4j2
Updated Branches:
  refs/heads/master ffd71dc9b -> 1e7f9f11c


LOG4J2-1297 added text to synchronous file logging response time section


Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/commit/1e7f9f11
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/tree/1e7f9f11
Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/diff/1e7f9f11

Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 1e7f9f11c2a23a62ea01d8f303c364ac89274a14
Parents: ffd71dc
Author: rpopma <rp...@apache.org>
Authored: Tue May 10 02:33:37 2016 +0900
Committer: rpopma <rp...@apache.org>
Committed: Tue May 10 02:33:37 2016 +0900

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------


http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/logging-log4j2/blob/1e7f9f11/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml
----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml b/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml
index 509a9d5..3b55012 100644
--- a/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml
+++ b/src/site/xdoc/manual/garbagefree.xml
@@ -422,12 +422,14 @@ public void garbageFree() {
           of tens of milliseconds or more; and attempting to increase the load even more results in larger and larger
           response time spikes.
         </p>
-        <h4>Synchronous Logging</h4>
-        <p>With synchronous logging, garbage-free logging still performs better, but the difference is less pronounced.
+        <h4>Synchronous File Logging</h4>
+        <p>With file synchronous logging, garbage-free logging still performs better, but the difference is less pronounced.
         </p>
-        <p>For both classic and garbage-free logging, synchronous logging showed response times of 3-5 milliseconds
-        even at loads of 100,000 messages/second. It may be possible to improve on this, we did not investigate
-        further yet.</p>
+        <p>For both classic and garbage-free logging, synchronous file logging showed response times of 3-5 milliseconds
+        even at loads of 100,000 messages/second.
+          When the workload is increased to 300,000 messages/second, classic logging shows response time pauses of 6
+          milliseconds where the garbage-free response times were less than 3 milliseconds.
+          It may be possible to improve on this, we did not investigate further yet.</p>
         <p><img src="../images/ResponseTimeSyncClassicVsGcFree.png" /></p>
 
         <a name="Throughput" />