You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@opennlp.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/01/14 19:09:27 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (OPENNLP-928) Deprecate UIMA training AEs

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15822916#comment-15822916 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on OPENNLP-928:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user kottmann opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/58

    OPENNLP-928: Deprecate old UIMA trainers and some utils

    The deprecated utils are only used by the trainers and have
    no other purpose, they should be removed as well.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/kottmann/opennlp OPENNLP-928

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/58.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #58
    
----
commit 224d0bf0aaf8f9978700fb66ef480e438dd6e2f0
Author: Jörn Kottmann <jo...@apache.org>
Date:   2017-01-14T19:07:36Z

    OPENNLP-928: Deprecate old UIMA trainers and some utils
    
    The deprecated utils are only used by the trainers and have
    no other purpose, they should be removed as well.

----


> Deprecate UIMA training AEs
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: OPENNLP-928
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-928
>             Project: OpenNLP
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: UIMA Integration
>            Reporter: Joern Kottmann
>             Fix For: 1.7.1
>
>
> Training via UIMA never really worked well, I propose to remove that code at some point. 
> Lets ask our users if anyone needs that and if there is no interest it is better to remove it, and if there is interest we could try to come up with a better solution.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)