You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/27 12:01:28 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-1643) Cleanup platform communication
protocol.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Vladimir Ozerov updated IGNITE-1643:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5)
1.6
> Cleanup platform communication protocol.
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-1643
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1643
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: interop
> Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> At the moment we have lots of .Net-specific objects travelling over a wire. E.g., user's .Net job is wrapped in some holder, then serialized and passed to Java, then Java pass this object over wire, etc..
> This approach have two drawbacks:
> 1) Adds unnecessary overhead on wrapping.
> 2) Java have no chance to understand what it is passing.
> If we unwrap all .Net objects and pass them to Java as is, we can achieve slightly better performance. But what is *much more* important - we will be able to unleash possibilities for very cool transparent interoperability between platforms. E.g., .Net will be able to execute Java services, Java node will be able to execute .Net/CPP jobs if it has matching portable class implemented, etc..
> Alternatively we can leave wrappers as is, but implement them in Java/CPP as well. This is not very good idea because of performance overhead.
> The feature *must be implemented in 1.5* because now we are free to change protocol as we want.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)