You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@metron.apache.org by "Matt Foley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/09/07 05:07:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (METRON-1163) RAT failures for
metron-interface/metron-alerts
Matt Foley created METRON-1163:
----------------------------------
Summary: RAT failures for metron-interface/metron-alerts
Key: METRON-1163
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-1163
Project: Metron
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 0.4.1
Reporter: Matt Foley
Assignee: RaghuMitra
Priority: Blocker
When the maven-rat-plugin runs against metron-alerts component, it has:
```
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.rat:apache-rat-plugin:0.12:check (default) on project metron-alerts: Too many files with unapproved license: 2 See RAT report in: .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/target/rat.txt
```
In the report file it says:
Files with unapproved licenses:
* .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/dist/3rdpartylicenses.txt
* .../metron-interface/metron-alerts/dist/styles.a0b6b99c10d9a13dc67e.bundle.css
The file "3rdpartylicenses.txt" is an empty (0-length) file. Should it be?
The styles.a0b6b99c10d9a13dc67e.bundle.css file is a complex file referencing
* Font Awesome 4.7.0 by @davegandy - http://fontawesome.io - @fontawesome
* License - http://fontawesome.io/license (Font: SIL OFL 1.1, CSS: MIT License)
which in turn says:
* all CSS files License: MIT License (Apache Category A)
* Font License: SIL OFL 1.1 (Apache Category B)
* Documentation License: CC BY 3.0 (Apache Category B)
Both of these files are downloaded during build (they're not in the Metron repository), but we're still responsible for the licensing. Suggestions for passing RAT test? If the suggestion is to exclude these files, please provide justification.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)