You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Richard S. Hall (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/06/04 23:04:56 UTC

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2355) [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2355:
-----------------------------------

        Fix Version/s: gogo-0.8.0
                           (was: gogo-0.6.0)
    Affects Version/s: gogo-0.6.0
                           (was: gogo-0.4.0)

> [Gogo] Closures and scopes should be handled in a fashion similar to normal commands
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2355
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2355
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.0
>            Reporter: Richard S. Hall
>             Fix For: gogo-0.8.0
>
>
> Currently, closures are treated differently when it comes to scopes than normal commands. It would be better if they were assigned an explicit default scope if none were specified and that scope could be placed in the scope path as desired. Likewise if the scope for a closure is explicitly specified when creating the closure.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.