You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/01/15 23:19:34 UTC
[jira] Created: (SLING-160) Group bundles by symbolic name than by
bundle id.
Group bundles by symbolic name than by bundle id.
-------------------------------------------------
Key: SLING-160
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160
Project: Sling
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Console
Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
from my experience the ordering of the bundles by bundle id is useless. i never needed to find a bundle by id.
more common is the search for a specific bundle of which i know it's name or even it's symbolic name (since most symbolic names contain some package notation).
so i think it would make more sense to group them by package in a first step. and maybe in a 2nd step to add some javascript that allows browsing the tree, i.e. expanding and collapsing the package nodes.
WDYT? i volunteer to implement it, if you think it's a good idea.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (SLING-160) Group bundles by symbolic name rather
than by bundle id.
Posted by "Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Tobias Bocanegra updated SLING-160:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Group bundles by symbolic name rather than by bundle id. (was: Group bundles by symbolic name than by bundle id.)
> Group bundles by symbolic name rather than by bundle id.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Console
> Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>
> from my experience the ordering of the bundles by bundle id is useless. i never needed to find a bundle by id.
> more common is the search for a specific bundle of which i know it's name or even it's symbolic name (since most symbolic names contain some package notation).
> so i think it would make more sense to group them by package in a first step. and maybe in a 2nd step to add some javascript that allows browsing the tree, i.e. expanding and collapsing the package nodes.
> WDYT? i volunteer to implement it, if you think it's a good idea.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SLING-160) Group bundles by symbolic name rather
than by bundle id.
Posted by "Felix Meschberger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560276#action_12560276 ]
Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-160:
-----------------------------------------
Implement ordering of bundles by their name in Rev. 613093.
Regarding the tree: A patch would of course be welcome :-)
> Group bundles by symbolic name rather than by bundle id.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Console
> Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>
> from my experience the ordering of the bundles by bundle id is useless. i never needed to find a bundle by id.
> more common is the search for a specific bundle of which i know it's name or even it's symbolic name (since most symbolic names contain some package notation).
> so i think it would make more sense to group them by package in a first step. and maybe in a 2nd step to add some javascript that allows browsing the tree, i.e. expanding and collapsing the package nodes.
> WDYT? i volunteer to implement it, if you think it's a good idea.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SLING-160) Group bundles by symbolic name rather
than by bundle id.
Posted by "Alexander Klimetschek (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559257#action_12559257 ]
Alexander Klimetschek commented on SLING-160:
---------------------------------------------
Browsing in a package tree structure sounds like a great idea!
> Group bundles by symbolic name rather than by bundle id.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Console
> Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>
> from my experience the ordering of the bundles by bundle id is useless. i never needed to find a bundle by id.
> more common is the search for a specific bundle of which i know it's name or even it's symbolic name (since most symbolic names contain some package notation).
> so i think it would make more sense to group them by package in a first step. and maybe in a 2nd step to add some javascript that allows browsing the tree, i.e. expanding and collapsing the package nodes.
> WDYT? i volunteer to implement it, if you think it's a good idea.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SLING-160) Group bundles by symbolic name rather
than by bundle id.
Posted by "Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560284#action_12560284 ]
Tobias Bocanegra commented on SLING-160:
----------------------------------------
ok, i will work on it...
> Group bundles by symbolic name rather than by bundle id.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-160
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-160
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Console
> Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>
> from my experience the ordering of the bundles by bundle id is useless. i never needed to find a bundle by id.
> more common is the search for a specific bundle of which i know it's name or even it's symbolic name (since most symbolic names contain some package notation).
> so i think it would make more sense to group them by package in a first step. and maybe in a 2nd step to add some javascript that allows browsing the tree, i.e. expanding and collapsing the package nodes.
> WDYT? i volunteer to implement it, if you think it's a good idea.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.