[PATCH] - WIN32 function defintion changes for mod_proxy

[Ian Holsman <Ia...@cnet.com>]

Hi.
I'm trying to get mod-proxy to build on NT, and need the following
patches applied to the core system.

could someone with more win32 experience than I do review & apply these.
all the patches involve is adding the AP_DECLARE()/AP_CORE_DECLARE macros on the return types
of functions used by mod_proxy so they will be exported in the DLL

Thanks

..Ian

Re: [PATCH] - WIN32 function defintion changes for mod_proxy

[Chuck Murcko <ch...@topsail.org>]

Looks straighforward to me, and there have been no objections from the 
lists, and we *do* need these declarations to run, so +1. I'll commit 
tonight so they're working for you when you commit tomorrow.

On Thursday, May 10, 2001, at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:

> Hi.
> I'm trying to get mod-proxy to build on NT, and need the following
> patches applied to the core system.
>
> could someone with more win32 experience than I do review & apply these.
> all the patches involve is adding the AP_DECLARE()/AP_CORE_DECLARE 
> macros on the return types
> of functions used by mod_proxy so they will be exported in the DLL
>
>
Chuck Murcko
Topsail Group
http://www.topsail.org/

Re: [PATCH] - WIN32 function defintion changes for mod_proxy

[Chuck Murcko <ch...@topsail.org>]

Looks straighforward to me, and there have been no objections from the 
lists, and we *do* need these declarations to run, so +1. I'll commit 
tonight so they're working for you when you commit tomorrow.

On Thursday, May 10, 2001, at 12:32 AM, Ian Holsman wrote:

> Hi.
> I'm trying to get mod-proxy to build on NT, and need the following
> patches applied to the core system.
>
> could someone with more win32 experience than I do review & apply these.
> all the patches involve is adding the AP_DECLARE()/AP_CORE_DECLARE 
> macros on the return types
> of functions used by mod_proxy so they will be exported in the DLL
>
>
Chuck Murcko
Topsail Group
http://www.topsail.org/