You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Katherine Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net> on 2011/12/02 02:29:22 UTC

10.8 tinderbox runs?

Looks like the last 10.8 tinderbox was Sept 30.
http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/tinderbox_10.8_16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/index.html 


Re: continuous integration tests, was: 10.8 tinderbox runs?

Posted by Katherine Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
On 12/2/2011 7:41 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
> On 12/2/11 1:55 AM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>> Katherine Marsden<km...@sbcglobal.net>  writes:
>>
>>> Looks like the last 10.8 tinderbox was Sept 30.
>>> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/tinderbox_10.8_16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/index.html 
>>>
>> I'm told that the machine that runs tinderbox tests on old branches has
>> died, so we're without that service for the time being.
>>
> So I'm a little unclear on what branches are being tested these days. 
> It seems that we no longer have continuous integration tests on the 
> 10.8 branch. I think that Oracle still runs nightly tests on that 
> branch but not on any other branches. The IBM branch tests seem to 
> have stopped on November 8 according to this web page: 
> http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/

For the IBM runs, the nightly tests on the branches run any time there 
are changes on the branch. They  have been running after Nov 8, but 
there seems to be a problem pushing the results out to Apache since that 
time.   So that needs investigation.

Thanks


Kathey

Re: continuous integration tests, was: 10.8 tinderbox runs?

Posted by Knut Anders Hatlen <kn...@oracle.com>.
Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com> writes:

> On 12/2/11 1:55 AM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>> Katherine Marsden<km...@sbcglobal.net>  writes:
>>
>>> Looks like the last 10.8 tinderbox was Sept 30.
>>> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/tinderbox_10.8_16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/index.html
>> I'm told that the machine that runs tinderbox tests on old branches has
>> died, so we're without that service for the time being.
>>
> So I'm a little unclear on what branches are being tested these
> days. It seems that we no longer have continuous integration tests on
> the 10.8 branch. I think that Oracle still runs nightly tests on that
> branch but not on any other branches.

That's right. The nightly tests run on trunk and the latest stable
branch (10.8). The machine that died ran tinderbox tests for all
branches except trunk, so we currently only have testing of 10.8 and
trunk.

-- 
Knut Anders

continuous integration tests, was: 10.8 tinderbox runs?

Posted by Rick Hillegas <ri...@oracle.com>.
On 12/2/11 1:55 AM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> Katherine Marsden<km...@sbcglobal.net>  writes:
>
>> Looks like the last 10.8 tinderbox was Sept 30.
>> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/tinderbox_10.8_16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/index.html
> I'm told that the machine that runs tinderbox tests on old branches has
> died, so we're without that service for the time being.
>
So I'm a little unclear on what branches are being tested these days. It 
seems that we no longer have continuous integration tests on the 10.8 
branch. I think that Oracle still runs nightly tests on that branch but 
not on any other branches. The IBM branch tests seem to have stopped on 
November 8 according to this web page: 
http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/

Thanks,
-Rick

Re: 10.8 tinderbox runs?

Posted by Knut Anders Hatlen <kn...@oracle.com>.
Katherine Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> Looks like the last 10.8 tinderbox was Sept 30.
> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/tinderbox_10.8_16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/index.html 

I'm told that the machine that runs tinderbox tests on old branches has
died, so we're without that service for the time being.

-- 
Knut Anders