You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@community.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2015/12/03 13:55:37 UTC

Thanks for AOO

Sometimes, a letter can make your day!


Re: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> To be clear, we ask first, and ensure that we edit out info
> that she doesn't want public.

I agree we should ask her for permission to publish an edited version of 
her letter. Actually https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/pmc/ is 
already a public place and this is a public list so everything is 
already public in a way... but I hope that for once we manage to get 
something published on the blog instead of just talking about it.

All it takes is that someone in the US reaches to their phone and calls 
Brenda (or e-mails her, but her e-mail address is not in the PDF 
apparently) to receive permission for the letter to be posted on the 
OpenOffice site or blog.

Regards,
   Andrea.

Re: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
To be clear, we ask first, and ensure that we edit out info
that she doesn't want public.

> On Dec 5, 2015, at 9:15 AM, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> wrote:
> 
> I would think so, yeah!
> 
>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 10:34 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Now I finally understand what people are talking about.
>> 
>> Awesome! Jim, is this something we could publish? I assume it's easy to ask for permission, and maybe send Brenda a T-shirt (I am in a T-shirt phase today :) ).
>> 
>> Hadrian
>> 
>> On 12/04/2015 10:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>>> The PDF is filed at <http://s.apache.org/0Yi>.
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
>>>> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 04:45
>>>> To: dev@community.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Thanks for AOO
>>>> 
>>>> Attachment must have gotten stripped off
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler
>>>> <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Did an attachment get stripped?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
>>>>>>> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
>>>>>>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>> 
> 


Re: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
I would think so, yeah!

> On Dec 4, 2015, at 10:34 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Now I finally understand what people are talking about.
> 
> Awesome! Jim, is this something we could publish? I assume it's easy to ask for permission, and maybe send Brenda a T-shirt (I am in a T-shirt phase today :) ).
> 
> Hadrian
> 
> On 12/04/2015 10:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>> The PDF is filed at <http://s.apache.org/0Yi>.
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 04:45
>>> To: dev@community.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Thanks for AOO
>>> 
>>> Attachment must have gotten stripped off
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.
>>>> 
>>>> Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o
>>>> 
>>>> On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler
>>> <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Did an attachment get stripped?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
>>>>>> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
>>>>>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>> 


Re: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
Now I finally understand what people are talking about.

Awesome! Jim, is this something we could publish? I assume it's easy to 
ask for permission, and maybe send Brenda a T-shirt (I am in a T-shirt 
phase today :) ).

Hadrian

On 12/04/2015 10:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> The PDF is filed at <http://s.apache.org/0Yi>.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
>> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 04:45
>> To: dev@community.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Thanks for AOO
>>
>> Attachment must have gotten stripped off
>>
>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.
>>>
>>> Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o
>>>
>>> On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>>>> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler
>> <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Did an attachment get stripped?
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
>>>>> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
>>>>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
>>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
>>>>>
>>>>
>

Re: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Rahul Jain <ra...@gmail.com>.
unsubscribe

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Ross Gardler <Ro...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Yay. Thanks for sharing.
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ________________________________
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton<ma...@apache.org>
> Sent: ‎12/‎4/‎2015 7:29 AM
> To: dev@community.apache.org<ma...@community.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: Thanks for AOO
>
> The PDF is filed at <
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fs.apache.org%2f0Yi&data=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7cb1366a13d6c849e2f3b608d2fcbfc3b7%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=HCKvTLrqWG1c7%2fiYfFuU0qLW0VOVxjVOeXtCNouTF1Q%3d
> >.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 04:45
> > To: dev@community.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Thanks for AOO
> >
> > Attachment must have gotten stripped off
> >
> > > On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.
> > >
> > > Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o
> > >
> > > On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> > >> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
> > >>
> > >>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler
> > <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Did an attachment get stripped?
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> > >>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
> > >>> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
> > >>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
> > >>>
> > >>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
> > >>>
> > >>
>
>

RE: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Ross Gardler <Ro...@microsoft.com>.
Yay. Thanks for sharing.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Dennis E. Hamilton<ma...@apache.org>
Sent: ‎12/‎4/‎2015 7:29 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org<ma...@community.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Thanks for AOO

The PDF is filed at <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fs.apache.org%2f0Yi&data=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7cb1366a13d6c849e2f3b608d2fcbfc3b7%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=HCKvTLrqWG1c7%2fiYfFuU0qLW0VOVxjVOeXtCNouTF1Q%3d>.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 04:45
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Thanks for AOO
>
> Attachment must have gotten stripped off
>
> > On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.
> >
> > Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o
> >
> > On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
> >>
> >>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler
> <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Did an attachment get stripped?
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
> >>> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
> >>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
> >>>
> >>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
> >>>
> >>


RE: Thanks for AOO

Posted by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <or...@apache.org>.
The PDF is filed at <http://s.apache.org/0Yi>.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 04:45
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Thanks for AOO
> 
> Attachment must have gotten stripped off
> 
> > On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.
> >
> > Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o
> >
> > On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> >> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
> >>
> >>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler
> <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Did an attachment get stripped?
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
> >>> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
> >>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
> >>>
> >>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
> >>>
> >>


Re: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Attachment must have gotten stripped off

> On Dec 4, 2015, at 7:34 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.
> 
> Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o
> 
> On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
>> 
>>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Did an attachment get stripped?
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
>>> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
>>> 
>>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
>>> 
>> 


Re: Thanks for AOO

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
Original mail was sent to Comdev; no attachment.

Followup with attachment was sent to private@openoffice.a.o

On 4 December 2015 at 12:21, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.
>
>> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> Did an attachment get stripped?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
>> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
>> Subject: Thanks for AOO
>>
>> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
>>
>

Re: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Hmmm... not sure. It shows up in my copy.

> On Dec 4, 2015, at 1:42 AM, Ross Gardler <Ro...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Did an attachment get stripped?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
> To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
> Subject: Thanks for AOO
> 
> Sometimes, a letter can make your day!
> 


RE: Thanks for AOO

Posted by Ross Gardler <Ro...@microsoft.com>.
Did an attachment get stripped?

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:jim@jaguNET.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 4:56 AM
To: ComDev <de...@community.apache.org>
Subject: Thanks for AOO

Sometimes, a letter can make your day!