You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by "sean schofield (JIRA)" <in...@incubator.apache.org> on 2005/03/07 18:14:57 UTC
[jira] Created: (MYFACES-119) New tree generates excessive warnings about component id
New tree generates excessive warnings about component id
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: MYFACES-119
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-119
Project: MyFaces
Type: Improvement
Versions: Nightly Build
Reporter: sean schofield
Tim Pyle has reported that the new tree is generating excessive debug messages. I investigated and determined that the messages were coming from UIComponent base and were being generated because I was programatically creating a few JSF components and not explicitly assigning them an id. Even though you can filter out these debug messages through proper log4j configuration, I think it is best to follow the recommended practice of generating a unique id using: context.getViewRoot().createUniqueId(). I will have the fix shortly.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: New developer
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>.
Hi Jean,
Heath is right, but also please read that guide:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
-Matthias
Heath Borders wrote:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10600
>
> That is the issue tracker URL. You can log issues/submit patches there.
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:13:51 -0800 (PST), Jean Ro <je...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am looking for instructions on how to contribute as a developer. Can you
>>please send me the information URL?
>>
>>Thanks.
>
>
>
Re: New developer
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
That's one way to get started. Look at existing bugs and help out
with patches.
Another is if you have a good idea for a MyFaces component that you
would like to contribute. You can submit it to the list (I recommend
the user's list for wider distribution) and ask if there is interest
in your idea.
sean
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:19:29 -0600, Heath Borders
<he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10600
>
> That is the issue tracker URL. You can log issues/submit patches there.
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:13:51 -0800 (PST), Jean Ro <je...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking for instructions on how to contribute as a developer. Can you
> > please send me the information URL?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> --
> -Heath Borders-Wing
> hborders@mail.win.org
>
Re: New developer
Posted by Heath Borders <he...@gmail.com>.
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10600
That is the issue tracker URL. You can log issues/submit patches there.
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:13:51 -0800 (PST), Jean Ro <je...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for instructions on how to contribute as a developer. Can you
> please send me the information URL?
>
> Thanks.
--
-Heath Borders-Wing
hborders@mail.win.org
Re: Better popup calendar
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
> The 2 calendar from javascript.internet.com are not that better than the
> one we have now.
Well that's one viewpoint. I was just throwing them out there for
discussion. It doesn't matter to me which calendar we use (although I
think we agree more calendar choices is better.) There are so many
choices of calendars out there that not everyone can be happy with
whatever the MyFaces calendar looks like. I do agree that the one you
suggested looks nice.
> Sylvain.
sean
Re: Better popup calendar
Posted by Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org>.
The 2 calendar from javascript.internet.com are not that better than the
one we have now.
I'll make an email asking for an ASL version agreement.
I'll let you know.
Sylvain.
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 19:02 +0100, Martin Marinschek wrote:
> Unfortunately the two licences are not compatible - we have had this
> discussion before, and this is why we have the calendar as is, that
> one was licensed under a very unrestrictive license (the main
> difference to the LGPL is that under the LGPL, all changes to the
> source base need to be given back to the source base, if I remember
> correctly.)
>
> You could always go and ask the developer, though, if he would either
> change the license to the ASL or if he would give out a version under
> the ASL.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:45:26 -0500, Sean Schofield
> <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I always thought it would be nice to provide a few different styles of
> > calendars. Here is the one we use now in our current application
> > (we've made some configuration changes so its not exactly the same):
> >
> > http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/timestamp.shtml
> >
> > This is also a nice one:
> >
> > http://javascript.internet.com/calendars/date-picker.html
> >
> > sean
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:34:27 -0600, Heath Borders
> > <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > If it isn't, we could just make a JSF wrapper to utilize the existing
> > > code. Then if people wanted to use it, they could access that code
> > > separately. Of course, this would be a lot more work, and might not
> > > be worth it if this wasn't a phenomenally better calendar.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:27:21 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > I've found this http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/ (popup) calendar,
> > > > that looks quite better than the one we're using now.
> > > >
> > > > It's released under the LGPL.
> > > > Does anyone know if it's ok to unclude LGLP code in Apache licensed projects
> > > > ?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Sylvain.
> > >
> > > --
> > > -Heath Borders-Wing
> > > hborders@mail.win.org
> > >
> >
New developer
Posted by Jean Ro <je...@yahoo.com>.
Hi,
I am looking for instructions on how to contribute as a developer. Can you please send me the information URL?
Thanks.
Re: Better popup calendar
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
Unfortunately the two licences are not compatible - we have had this
discussion before, and this is why we have the calendar as is, that
one was licensed under a very unrestrictive license (the main
difference to the LGPL is that under the LGPL, all changes to the
source base need to be given back to the source base, if I remember
correctly.)
You could always go and ask the developer, though, if he would either
change the license to the ASL or if he would give out a version under
the ASL.
regards,
Martin
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:45:26 -0500, Sean Schofield
<se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I always thought it would be nice to provide a few different styles of
> calendars. Here is the one we use now in our current application
> (we've made some configuration changes so its not exactly the same):
>
> http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/timestamp.shtml
>
> This is also a nice one:
>
> http://javascript.internet.com/calendars/date-picker.html
>
> sean
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:34:27 -0600, Heath Borders
> <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If it isn't, we could just make a JSF wrapper to utilize the existing
> > code. Then if people wanted to use it, they could access that code
> > separately. Of course, this would be a lot more work, and might not
> > be worth it if this wasn't a phenomenally better calendar.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:27:21 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > I've found this http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/ (popup) calendar,
> > > that looks quite better than the one we're using now.
> > >
> > > It's released under the LGPL.
> > > Does anyone know if it's ok to unclude LGLP code in Apache licensed projects
> > > ?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Sylvain.
> >
> > --
> > -Heath Borders-Wing
> > hborders@mail.win.org
> >
>
Re: Better popup calendar
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
I always thought it would be nice to provide a few different styles of
calendars. Here is the one we use now in our current application
(we've made some configuration changes so its not exactly the same):
http://www.javascriptkit.com/script/script2/timestamp.shtml
This is also a nice one:
http://javascript.internet.com/calendars/date-picker.html
sean
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:34:27 -0600, Heath Borders
<he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If it isn't, we could just make a JSF wrapper to utilize the existing
> code. Then if people wanted to use it, they could access that code
> separately. Of course, this would be a lot more work, and might not
> be worth it if this wasn't a phenomenally better calendar.
>
>
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:27:21 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I've found this http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/ (popup) calendar,
> > that looks quite better than the one we're using now.
> >
> > It's released under the LGPL.
> > Does anyone know if it's ok to unclude LGLP code in Apache licensed projects
> > ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sylvain.
>
> --
> -Heath Borders-Wing
> hborders@mail.win.org
>
Re: Better popup calendar
Posted by Heath Borders <he...@gmail.com>.
If it isn't, we could just make a JSF wrapper to utilize the existing
code. Then if people wanted to use it, they could access that code
separately. Of course, this would be a lot more work, and might not
be worth it if this wasn't a phenomenally better calendar.
On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 13:27:21 -0400, Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've found this http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/ (popup) calendar,
> that looks quite better than the one we're using now.
>
> It's released under the LGPL.
> Does anyone know if it's ok to unclude LGLP code in Apache licensed projects
> ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sylvain.
--
-Heath Borders-Wing
hborders@mail.win.org
Better popup calendar
Posted by Sylvain Vieujot <sv...@apache.org>.
I've found this http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/ (popup)
calendar, that looks quite better than the one we're using now.
It's released under the LGPL.
Does anyone know if it's ok to unclude LGLP code in Apache licensed
projects ?
Thanks,
Sylvain.
[jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-119) New tree generates excessive warnings about component id
Posted by "Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA)" <in...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-119?page=history ]
Matthias Weßendorf resolved MYFACES-119:
----------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> New tree generates excessive warnings about component id
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-119
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-119
> Project: MyFaces
> Type: Improvement
> Versions: Nightly Build
> Reporter: sean schofield
>
> Tim Pyle has reported that the new tree is generating excessive debug messages. I investigated and determined that the messages were coming from UIComponent base and were being generated because I was programatically creating a few JSF components and not explicitly assigning them an id. Even though you can filter out these debug messages through proper log4j configuration, I think it is best to follow the recommended practice of generating a unique id using: context.getViewRoot().createUniqueId(). I will have the fix shortly.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira