You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Matt Ryan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/07/12 17:00:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-7603) [DirectBinaryAccess][DISCUSS]
Oak API extensions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16541947#comment-16541947 ]
Matt Ryan edited comment on OAK-7603 at 7/12/18 4:59 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------
[~mreutegg] I've made the changes you requested, the are available in PRs 93 and 94.
Regarding the point about {{ProviderType}} - should this annotation also be applied to {{HttpDataRecordProvider}} and {{HttpDataRecordUpload}} in the {{oak-blob-plugins}} bundle?
was (Author: mattvryan):
[~mreutegg] I've made the changes you requested, the are available in PRs 93 and 94.
Regarding the point about `ProviderType` - should this annotation also be applied to `HttpDataRecordProvider` and `HttpDataRecordUpload` in the `oak-blob-plugins` bundle?
> [DirectBinaryAccess][DISCUSS] Oak API extensions
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-7603
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7603
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Technical task
> Components: api
> Reporter: Marcel Reutegger
> Assignee: Matt Ryan
> Priority: Major
>
> Review and discuss the API extensions in oak-api. If desired these changes can be committed before the implementation is ready.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)