You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xindice-users@xml.apache.org by Thomas Zastrow <ch...@thomas-zastrow.de> on 2003/12/04 19:31:57 UTC
Is it realy not possible ...
... to access the content - and not just an attribute - of a tag via XPath? What I mean: the solution from Jarkko a thread above doesn't work ...
If it is so, I think Xindice is not realy usable? Please correct me!!
Gretings,
Tom
--
----------------------------------------------------
| So ein Unsinn sich einer Sekte anzuschliessen |
| wenn man Bier zuhause hat |
|--------------------------------------------------|
| http://www.thomas-zastrow.de |
----------------------------------------------------
Re: AW: Is it realy not possible ...
Posted by Thomas Zastrow <ch...@thomas-zastrow.de>.
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:24:06 +0100
Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@antbuild.com> wrote:
> the text() function gives the value of the text node.
Hello Antoine,
that looks good, a query like this works fine:
xindice xpath_query -c /db/corpora/taz -q "/corpus//token[text()]"
I hope that it is possible to expand this query in the way "Give me all tags which contains the String 'abc'" ... ???
Greetings and thanks,
Tom
--
----------------------------------------------------
| So ein Unsinn sich einer Sekte anzuschliessen |
| wenn man Bier zuhause hat |
|--------------------------------------------------|
| http://www.thomas-zastrow.de |
----------------------------------------------------
AW: Is it realy not possible ...
Posted by Antoine Levy-Lambert <an...@antbuild.com>.
the text() function gives the value of the text node.
Cheers,
Antoine
-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Thomas Zastrow [mailto:chef@thomas-zastrow.de]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2003 19:32
An: xindice-users@xml.apache.org
Betreff: Is it realy not possible ...
... to access the content - and not just an attribute - of a tag via XPath?
What I mean: the solution from Jarkko a thread above doesn't work ...
If it is so, I think Xindice is not realy usable? Please correct me!!
Gretings,
Tom