You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Doug Meil (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/07/29 15:23:09 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-4147) StoreFile query usage report

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13072807#comment-13072807 ] 

Doug Meil commented on HBASE-4147:
----------------------------------

I think that instrumenting StoreFileScanner by gathering time spent for all the 'next' and 'seek' calls would do it.  And then on 'close' it would publish the detailed record to some internal service that would gather up all the these detail records and then periodically dump the summary. 

I'm doing some hand-waving here because we don't want to introduce concurrency issues in the publishing process (e.g., publishing to something that is synchronized will effectively single-thread StoreFileScanners which would be a non-starter), but based on my understanding of the code it seems like this would be a fairly targeted change.  

Thoughts?  

> StoreFile query usage report
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-4147
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4147
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Doug Meil
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Detailed information on what HBase is doing in terms of reads is hard to come by.
> What would be useful is to have a periodic StoreFile query report.  Specifically, this could run on a configured interval (e.g., every 30 seconds, 60 seconds) and dump the output to the log files.
> This would have all StoreFiles accessed during the reporting period (and with the Path we would also know region, CF, and table), # of times the StoreFile was accessed, the size of the StoreFile, and the total time (ms) spent processing that StoreFile.
> Even this level of summary would be useful to detect a which tables & CFs are being accessed the most, and including the StoreFile would provide insight into relative "uncompaction" (i.e., lots of StoreFiles).
> I think the log-output, as opposed to UI, is an important facet with this.  I'm assuming that users will slice and dice this data on their own so I think we should skip any kind of admin view for now (i.e., new JSPs, new APIs to expose this data).  Just getting this to log-file would be a big improvement.
> Will this have a non-zero performance impact?  Yes.  Hopefully small, but yes it will.  However, flying a plane without any instrumentation isn't fun.  :-)  
>  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira