You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com> on 2010/08/22 06:34:03 UTC
Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
deploy it on stax.
Does anyone have a problem with that?
D.
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs - ESME-259
Posted by Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>.
Ethan,
Can you resend your last mail on this subject, to me only at least. That is,
re, your changes to streams.html, with maybe also telling me what you were
trying do with the file and in which branch/tag and what does the copy in
tags/apache-esme-1.0-RC1-incubating belong to. Is this the one that is
currently deployed in Stax etc.
I accidentally deleted your lats mail from my hand-held.
Imtiaz
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs - ESME-259
Posted by Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>.
There was a lot of work done on that page. You can see the revision
history here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/info_view/streams.html?view=log
It looks like I may have broken this functionality by moving the
displayStreams snippet around in 942677:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/esme/trunk/server/src/main/webapp/info_view/streams.html?r1=942677&r2=965092
If you want to move it back and see if it works, that would be fine. I
think it would probably be a better idea to fix the way the page works
so that it is not sensitive to the ordering of the snippets, but I
don't have a really good knowledge of how this particular page works
so maybe there is a good reason for this.
Ethan
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I said, the directory 'apache-esme-1.0-RC1-incubating' within 'tags' has
> a copy of streams.html that is *totally* different from the one in trunk, I
> mean they are two completely different files. Nothing common between them.
>
> Dick, says the stax deployment does not exhibit bug ESME-259. The build on
> trunk, on my machine does exhibit the bug.
>
> Further the tags version of streams has a comment which certainly maybe
> gives a first reason why the trunk version exhibits the bug since the
> version in trunk does not conform to the condition in the comment, to quote
> "The displayStreams snippet *MUST* appear on the page before the main
> snippet". But the fix may require more, unless we simply need to use the
> version in tags.
>
> Can you shed more light ?
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ethan Jewett" <es...@gmail.com>
> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 9:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs - ESME-259
>
>
> Do you mean the /tags directory in SVN? Whenever we make a release
> (one so far ...) we tag it in SVN so that there is an immutable record
> of the state of the code-base at that point. This way we can release
> bug-fix-only releases if we really need to, while continuing to work
> on features in trunk.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> By the way, streams.html (relevant to this bug) in trunk is different from
>> the one in tags.
>>
>> Can somebody clarify...
>>
>> What is tags about, more generally ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Imtiaz
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>
>>
>> The last stax deplyoment (
>> http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12,
>> 2010.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the
>>> date
>>> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see
>>> what
>>> happened.
>>>
>>> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment.
>>>
>>> Imtiaz
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>>
>>>
>>>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
>>>> that it works there.
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dick,
>>>>>
>>>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return,
>>>>> this
>>>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it
>>>>> was
>>>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it
>>>>> done
>>>>> asap.
>>>>>
>>>>> Imtiaz
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>>>>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
>>>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>>>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>>>>>> deploy it on stax.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> D.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs - ESME-259
Posted by Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>.
As I said, the directory 'apache-esme-1.0-RC1-incubating' within 'tags' has
a copy of streams.html that is *totally* different from the one in trunk, I
mean they are two completely different files. Nothing common between them.
Dick, says the stax deployment does not exhibit bug ESME-259. The build on
trunk, on my machine does exhibit the bug.
Further the tags version of streams has a comment which certainly maybe
gives a first reason why the trunk version exhibits the bug since the
version in trunk does not conform to the condition in the comment, to quote
"The displayStreams snippet *MUST* appear on the page before the main
snippet". But the fix may require more, unless we simply need to use the
version in tags.
Can you shed more light ?
Imtiaz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ethan Jewett" <es...@gmail.com>
To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs - ESME-259
Do you mean the /tags directory in SVN? Whenever we make a release
(one so far ...) we tag it in SVN so that there is an immutable record
of the state of the code-base at that point. This way we can release
bug-fix-only releases if we really need to, while continuing to work
on features in trunk.
Ethan
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> By the way, streams.html (relevant to this bug) in trunk is different from
> the one in tags.
>
> Can somebody clarify...
>
> What is tags about, more generally ?
>
> Thanks
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
> <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>
>
> The last stax deplyoment (
> http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12,
> 2010.
>
> D.
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the
>> date
>> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see
>> what
>> happened.
>>
>> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment.
>>
>> Imtiaz
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM
>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>
>>
>>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
>>> that it works there.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dick,
>>>>
>>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return,
>>>> this
>>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it
>>>> was
>>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it
>>>> done
>>>> asap.
>>>>
>>>> Imtiaz
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>>>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
>>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>>>>> deploy it on stax.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>>>>
>>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs - ESME-259
Posted by Ethan Jewett <es...@gmail.com>.
Do you mean the /tags directory in SVN? Whenever we make a release
(one so far ...) we tag it in SVN so that there is an immutable record
of the state of the code-base at that point. This way we can release
bug-fix-only releases if we really need to, while continuing to work
on features in trunk.
Ethan
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, streams.html (relevant to this bug) in trunk is different from
> the one in tags.
>
> Can somebody clarify...
>
> What is tags about, more generally ?
>
> Thanks
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>
>
> The last stax deplyoment (
> http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12,
> 2010.
>
> D.
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the
>> date
>> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see
>> what
>> happened.
>>
>> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment.
>>
>> Imtiaz
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM
>> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>
>>
>>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
>>> that it works there.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dick,
>>>>
>>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return,
>>>> this
>>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was
>>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it
>>>> done
>>>> asap.
>>>>
>>>> Imtiaz
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>>>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
>>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>>>>> deploy it on stax.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>>>>
>>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs - ESME-259
Posted by Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>.
By the way, streams.html (relevant to this bug) in trunk is different from
the one in tags.
Can somebody clarify...
What is tags about, more generally ?
Thanks
Imtiaz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
The last stax deplyoment (
http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12,
2010.
D.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the
> date
> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see
> what
> happened.
>
> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment.
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
> <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>
>
>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
>> that it works there.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dick,
>>>
>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return,
>>> this
>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was
>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it
>>> done
>>> asap.
>>>
>>> Imtiaz
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>>
>>>
>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>>>> deploy it on stax.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
Posted by Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>.
Find attached to the Jira autologically named file
ESmeJira259PatchByRevertingTo_r942677_Reopens231Presumably.diff :-)
Somebody now needs to re-look at 231 :(
Imtiaz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
The last stax deplyoment (
http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12,
2010.
D.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the
> date
> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see
> what
> happened.
>
> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment.
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
> <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>
>
>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
>> that it works there.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dick,
>>>
>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return,
>>> this
>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was
>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it
>>> done
>>> asap.
>>>
>>> Imtiaz
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>>
>>>
>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>>>> deploy it on stax.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
The last stax deplyoment (
http://esmecloudserverapache.DickHirsch.staxapps.net) was on Jul 12,
2010.
D.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the date
> of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see what
> happened.
>
> I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment.
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>
>
>> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
>> that it works there.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dick,
>>>
>>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return, this
>>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was
>>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it
>>> done
>>> asap.
>>>
>>> Imtiaz
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
>>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>>
>>>
>>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>>>> deploy it on stax.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
Posted by Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>.
In that case, it will help to locate the problem if you can tell me the date
of that deployment so that I can check the subsequent check-ins to see what
happened.
I myself will not be looking at the Stax deployment.
Imtiaz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
> If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
> that it works there.
>
> D.
>
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Dick,
>>
>> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return, this
>> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was
>> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it
>> done
>> asap.
>>
>> Imtiaz
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch"
>> <hi...@gmail.com>
>> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
>> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>>
>>
>>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>>> deploy it on stax.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>>
>>> D.
>>
>>
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
Posted by Richard Hirsch <hi...@gmail.com>.
If you take a look at the current deployment on stax, you will see
that it works there.
D.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dick,
>
> Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return, this
> morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was
> working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it done
> asap.
>
> Imtiaz
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
> To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
> Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
>
>
>> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
>> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
>> deploy it on stax.
>>
>> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>>
>> D.
>
>
Re: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
Posted by Imtiaz Ahmed H E <in...@gmail.com>.
Dick,
Following your earlier mail saying you find new bugs on your return, this
morning I started investigating ESME-259 and it doesn't look like it was
working at any time. Not too sure. Still figuring it out. Will have it done
asap.
Imtiaz
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Hirsch" <hi...@gmail.com>
To: <es...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 10:04 AM
Subject: Stax deployment with new code - despite bugs
> As I work towards the next release, I've found a new bugs in the
> current source that don't exist on stax (For example,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-259). I'd still like to
> deploy it on stax.
>
> Does anyone have a problem with that?
>
> D.