You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/21 12:03:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-7194) AdapterManager sorts AdapterFactory implementations lowest ranking first

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16213866#comment-16213866 ] 

Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-7194:
-----------------------------------------

We usually always prefer highest ranking over lowest, so I think the implementation is wrong

> AdapterManager sorts AdapterFactory implementations lowest ranking first
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-7194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7194
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Extensions
>    Affects Versions: Adapter 2.1.10
>            Reporter: Stefan Seifert
>
> the current implementation of AdapterManager uses a AdapterFactoryDescriptorMap to sort the AdapterFactory implementations found.
> this is done using a TreeMap with the ServiceReference as key. ServiceReference implements a compareTo.
> according to its documentation the default implementation sorts with service-ranking lowest-first/service id highest-first:
> https://osgi.org/javadoc/r6/core/org/osgi/framework/ServiceReference.html#compareTo(java.lang.Object)
> when picking a service from multiple ones using BundleContext.getService, the service with hightest service ranking/lowest service id is returned.
> i would expect the same from the AdapterManager implementation - if multiple implementations match pick that one with highest ranking/lowest service id.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)