You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@arrow.apache.org by "jychen7 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/01/23 04:46:01 UTC
[GitHub] [arrow-datafusion-python] jychen7 commented on issue #123: [DISCUSS] arrow-datafusion-python versioning
jychen7 commented on issue #123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/123#issuecomment-1399798994
I like the idea of explicit version linking for language binding.
It is hard to have a general rule using Semver for bindings. See https://github.com/semver/semver/issues/352
However, from Datafusion history, it nornally uses major version and rarely use minor version. It haven't use patch version so far. So probably we can specially align on `major.minor` and let bindings use `patch` version.
e.g.
Rust 16.0.0 -> Python 16.0.0, 16.0.1, etc
Rust 16.1.0 -> Python 16.1.0, 16.1.1, etc
What if Datafusion Rust starts using patch version? That's a trade off we need to accept. If our rule is aligb on `major.minor`, then I think following is acceptable.
Rust 16.0.0 - Python 16.0.0, 16.0.1, 16.0.2
Rust 16.0.1 - Python 16.0.3, etc
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/16.1.0-rc1/dev/release/README.md
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org