You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@crail.apache.org by "Patrick Stuedi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/06/26 08:42:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CRAIL-101) Clarify NVMf limitations in
documentation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRAIL-101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16873093#comment-16873093 ]
Patrick Stuedi commented on CRAIL-101:
--------------------------------------
Why can we not multiplex multiple NQNs by using different virtual ports?
> Clarify NVMf limitations in documentation
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CRAIL-101
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CRAIL-101
> Project: Apache Crail
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jonas Pfefferle
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently only namespace 1 and same NQN on all datanodes is supported due to the namenode not storing additional information besides ip/port.
> cf. [https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CRAIL/issues/CRAIL-95]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)