You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cloudstack.apache.org by Bjoern Meier <bj...@gmail.com> on 2015/09/25 23:45:42 UTC
Is this a bug?
Hi,
untagged public network doesn't work with Cloudstack 4.4. The virtual
router doesn't start. In the log is a Java exception
690 ERROR [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-70:ctx-318fa261) Unexpected exception:
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "untagged" will shortcut
rest of IPAssoc commands
Greetings,
Björn
Re: Is this a bug?
Posted by Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net>.
Björn,
"untagged" network has tag = 0
Vadim
On 2015-09-26 00:45, Bjoern Meier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> untagged public network doesn't work with Cloudstack 4.4. The virtual
> router doesn't start. In the log is a Java exception
> 690 ERROR [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
> (DirectAgent-70:ctx-318fa261) Unexpected exception:
> java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "untagged" will
> shortcut
> rest of IPAssoc commands
>
> Greetings,
> Björn
Re: Is this a bug?
Posted by Bjoern Meier <bj...@gmail.com>.
hi Anshul,
Anshul Gangwar <an...@citrix.com> schrieb am Mo., 28. Sep. 2015 um
07:55 Uhr:
> Its a known issue and already fixed in master
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8420
Perfect. Thanks a lot.
Greetings,
Björn
AW: esp on VR
Posted by "Jochim, Ingo" <In...@bautzen-it.de>.
That was the original plan.
But I need to use ESP directly.
I can see the packages arriving at the VR, but cannot forward the traffic to a VM.
Ingo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Simon Weller [mailto:sweller@ena.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 15:00
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: esp on VR
Can you encapsulate your ESP packets in UDP?
- Si
________________________________________
From: Jochim, Ingo <In...@bautzen-it.de>
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 7:55 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: esp on VR
I can select TCP, UDP and ICMP only on creating firewall rules and forwardings.
But not ESP.
Any chance to get this to work?
Regards,
Ingo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jochim, Ingo [mailto:Ingo.Jochim@bautzen-it.de]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 11:56
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: esp on VR
Hallo all,
is there any chance to allow protocol ESP on the virtual router and forward it to a VM (network firewall settings)?
Thanks and regards,
Ingo
Re: esp on VR
Posted by Simon Weller <sw...@ena.com>.
Can you encapsulate your ESP packets in UDP?
- Si
________________________________________
From: Jochim, Ingo <In...@bautzen-it.de>
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 7:55 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: esp on VR
I can select TCP, UDP and ICMP only on creating firewall rules and forwardings.
But not ESP.
Any chance to get this to work?
Regards,
Ingo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jochim, Ingo [mailto:Ingo.Jochim@bautzen-it.de]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 11:56
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: esp on VR
Hallo all,
is there any chance to allow protocol ESP on the virtual router and forward it to a VM (network firewall settings)?
Thanks and regards,
Ingo
AW: esp on VR
Posted by "Jochim, Ingo" <In...@bautzen-it.de>.
I can select TCP, UDP and ICMP only on creating firewall rules and forwardings.
But not ESP.
Any chance to get this to work?
Regards,
Ingo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jochim, Ingo [mailto:Ingo.Jochim@bautzen-it.de]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. September 2015 11:56
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: esp on VR
Hallo all,
is there any chance to allow protocol ESP on the virtual router and forward it to a VM (network firewall settings)?
Thanks and regards,
Ingo
esp on VR
Posted by "Jochim, Ingo" <In...@bautzen-it.de>.
Hallo all,
is there any chance to allow protocol ESP on the virtual router and forward it to a VM (network firewall settings)?
Thanks and regards,
Ingo
Re: Is this a bug?
Posted by Anshul Gangwar <an...@citrix.com>.
Its a known issue and already fixed in master https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8420
Regards,
Anshul
> On 26-Sep-2015, at 3:15 AM, Bjoern Meier <bj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> untagged public network doesn't work with Cloudstack 4.4. The virtual
> router doesn't start. In the log is a Java exception
> 690 ERROR [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
> (DirectAgent-70:ctx-318fa261) Unexpected exception:
> java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "untagged" will shortcut
> rest of IPAssoc commands
>
> Greetings,
> Björn
Re: Is this a bug?
Posted by Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net>.
Björn,
Put public vlan ID = 0, not blank. VLAN ID can not be blank. If
you start to record all cases where wrong input causes java exception -
we will sink here. Probably developer has put string "untagged"
intentionally to fire NFE and see this error in the log. It is not a
bug.
Vadim.
On 2015-09-26 19:41, Bjoern Meier wrote:
> hi,
>
> Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> schrieb am Sa., 26. Sep. 2015 um
> 16:40 Uhr:
>
>> Björn,
>>
>> "untagged" network has tag = 0
> I'll test it. But, netherless it is a bug then. If you didn't tag
> public
> network a string "untagged" rtake place as a default value and java
> throws
> a NumberException. This shouldn't happen in a release, should it? I can
> reproduce it. Just create a zone with advanced network and leave VLANID
> blank in public network.
>
> Greetings,
> Björn
Re: Is this a bug?
Posted by Bjoern Meier <bj...@gmail.com>.
hi,
Vadim Kimlaychuk <va...@kickcloud.net> schrieb am Sa., 26. Sep. 2015 um
16:40 Uhr:
> Björn,
>
> "untagged" network has tag = 0
>
I'll test it. But, netherless it is a bug then. If you didn't tag public
network a string "untagged" rtake place as a default value and java throws
a NumberException. This shouldn't happen in a release, should it? I can
reproduce it. Just create a zone with advanced network and leave VLANID
blank in public network.
Greetings,
Björn