You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@buildstream.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/28 15:01:02 UTC

[GitHub] [buildstream] nanonyme opened a new issue, #1804: bst2: Slow performance with integration commands

nanonyme opened a new issue, #1804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/buildstream/issues/1804

   We have been already for some time had severe performance issues with integration commands. Performance doesn't seem to be related to what integration commands actually do, simply running them is slow.
   
   Downstream ticket https://gitlab.com/freedesktop-sdk/freedesktop-sdk/-/issues/1519


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@buildstream.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [buildstream] abderrahim commented on issue #1804: bst2: Slow performance with integration commands

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
abderrahim commented on issue #1804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/buildstream/issues/1804#issuecomment-1367465246

   > All of the artifacts were at this point locally available
   
   Are we sure of that? I think this would only be the case if there was a world rebuild.
   
   Regardless of this, I agree that the times we noticed we absurdly high.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@buildstream.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


[GitHub] [buildstream] nanonyme commented on issue #1804: bst2: Slow performance with integration commands

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
nanonyme commented on issue #1804:
URL: https://github.com/apache/buildstream/issues/1804#issuecomment-1367419980

   This was after a lot of debugging pointed to usage of storage-service. All of the artifacts were at this point locally available (they were just build) so no fetches from storage service were necessary.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@buildstream.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org