You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@servicemix.apache.org by Jörg Jansen <Jo...@inform-software.com> on 2020/09/18 17:00:13 UTC
servicemix move to karaf
Hi everybody,
is there already a schedule, when the move of the specs/bundles should be done?
Best regards,
Jörg
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
Sent: Montag, 6. Juli 2020 09:55
To: users@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes
Hi,
It has been discussed some weeks ago on the dev mailing list.
Parts of ServiceMix (bundles, specs) will move to Karaf and the ServiceMix distribution will move to attic.
ServiceMix distribution is outdated and moving directly to Karaf and Camel will allow users to use updated versions.
Regards
JB
> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:46, Francois Liot <fr...@liot.org> a écrit :
>
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>
> You do encourage to use Camel in Karaf directly, being one of the most
> important comiter and part of the Apache Foundation, does it mean you
> are announcing the official end-of-life of ServiceMix ?
> Let us know,
>
> Regards,
> Francois
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> How do you set the route ID ?
>>
>> By the way, I strongly encourage you to use Camel with Karaf directly
>> (with updated version) instead of ServiceMix.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:16, Sneharghya Pathak <sp...@gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>>
>>> Hello ServiceMix users,
>>>
>>>
>>> I am using ServiceMix 7.0.1 with Camel 2.16.5. The Camel routes have
>>> been written using Blueprint XML.
>>>
>>> I have seen a strange behaviour where on deploying the Camel routes,
>>> ServiceMix is displaying the bundles as active, but the routes are
>>> not installed. I need to redeploy multiple times to get the routes running.
>>>
>>> The second issue is that, once the routes are running, ServiceMix
>>> shows
>> all
>>> routes in a context as having the same route-id.
>>>
>>> Context Route Status
>>> Total # Failed # Inflight # Uptime
>>> ------- ----- ------
>>> ------- -------- ---------- ------
>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>
>>> Here I know for a fact that all routes in the star context have
>>> separate route ids set in the blueprint xml.
>>>
>>> What might be causing this behavior and how should I fix this?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Sneharghya
>>
>>
RE: servicemix move to karaf
Posted by Jörg Jansen <Jo...@inform-software.com>.
Hi JB,
thanks fort he update.
Regards,
Jörg
-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
Sent: Samstag, 19. September 2020 07:40
To: users@servicemix.apache.org
Subject: Re: servicemix move to karaf
Hi Jörg,
The preparation is a bit longer than expected mostly to avoid just a move.
The spec bundles are already in preparation (using Karaf features, which will be easier for user).
The TP SMX bundles preparation not yet start (I plan a new feature in Pax URL to create a bundle using a descriptor on the fly).
Reasonably, the move won’t be effective before the end of this year.
I will keep you posted on the mailing list.
Regards
JB
> Le 18 sept. 2020 à 19:00, Jörg Jansen <Jo...@inform-software.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> is there already a schedule, when the move of the specs/bundles should be done?
>
> Best regards,
> Jörg
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> Sent: Montag, 6. Juli 2020 09:55
> To: users@servicemix.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes
>
> Hi,
>
> It has been discussed some weeks ago on the dev mailing list.
>
> Parts of ServiceMix (bundles, specs) will move to Karaf and the ServiceMix distribution will move to attic.
>
> ServiceMix distribution is outdated and moving directly to Karaf and Camel will allow users to use updated versions.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:46, Francois Liot <fr...@liot.org> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>>
>> You do encourage to use Camel in Karaf directly, being one of the
>> most important comiter and part of the Apache Foundation, does it
>> mean you are announcing the official end-of-life of ServiceMix ?
>> Let us know,
>>
>> Regards,
>> Francois
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> How do you set the route ID ?
>>>
>>> By the way, I strongly encourage you to use Camel with Karaf
>>> directly (with updated version) instead of ServiceMix.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:16, Sneharghya Pathak <sp...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hello ServiceMix users,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am using ServiceMix 7.0.1 with Camel 2.16.5. The Camel routes
>>>> have been written using Blueprint XML.
>>>>
>>>> I have seen a strange behaviour where on deploying the Camel
>>>> routes, ServiceMix is displaying the bundles as active, but the
>>>> routes are not installed. I need to redeploy multiple times to get the routes running.
>>>>
>>>> The second issue is that, once the routes are running, ServiceMix
>>>> shows
>>> all
>>>> routes in a context as having the same route-id.
>>>>
>>>> Context Route Status
>>>> Total # Failed # Inflight # Uptime
>>>> ------- ----- ------
>>>> ------- -------- ---------- ------
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>>
>>>> Here I know for a fact that all routes in the star context have
>>>> separate route ids set in the blueprint xml.
>>>>
>>>> What might be causing this behavior and how should I fix this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Sneharghya
>>>
>>>
>
Re: servicemix move to karaf
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Jörg,
The preparation is a bit longer than expected mostly to avoid just a move.
The spec bundles are already in preparation (using Karaf features, which will be easier for user).
The TP SMX bundles preparation not yet start (I plan a new feature in Pax URL to create a bundle using a descriptor on the fly).
Reasonably, the move won’t be effective before the end of this year.
I will keep you posted on the mailing list.
Regards
JB
> Le 18 sept. 2020 à 19:00, Jörg Jansen <Jo...@inform-software.com> a écrit :
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> is there already a schedule, when the move of the specs/bundles should be done?
>
> Best regards,
> Jörg
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> Sent: Montag, 6. Juli 2020 09:55
> To: users@servicemix.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Servicemix is setting the same id for routes
>
> Hi,
>
> It has been discussed some weeks ago on the dev mailing list.
>
> Parts of ServiceMix (bundles, specs) will move to Karaf and the ServiceMix distribution will move to attic.
>
> ServiceMix distribution is outdated and moving directly to Karaf and Camel will allow users to use updated versions.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:46, Francois Liot <fr...@liot.org> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>>
>> You do encourage to use Camel in Karaf directly, being one of the most
>> important comiter and part of the Apache Foundation, does it mean you
>> are announcing the official end-of-life of ServiceMix ?
>> Let us know,
>>
>> Regards,
>> Francois
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 9:35 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> How do you set the route ID ?
>>>
>>> By the way, I strongly encourage you to use Camel with Karaf directly
>>> (with updated version) instead of ServiceMix.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>> Le 6 juil. 2020 à 09:16, Sneharghya Pathak <sp...@gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hello ServiceMix users,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am using ServiceMix 7.0.1 with Camel 2.16.5. The Camel routes have
>>>> been written using Blueprint XML.
>>>>
>>>> I have seen a strange behaviour where on deploying the Camel routes,
>>>> ServiceMix is displaying the bundles as active, but the routes are
>>>> not installed. I need to redeploy multiple times to get the routes running.
>>>>
>>>> The second issue is that, once the routes are running, ServiceMix
>>>> shows
>>> all
>>>> routes in a context as having the same route-id.
>>>>
>>>> Context Route Status
>>>> Total # Failed # Inflight # Uptime
>>>> ------- ----- ------
>>>> ------- -------- ---------- ------
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>> star star-flattoxml Started
>>>> 10225 0 0 1 day 19 hours
>>>>
>>>> Here I know for a fact that all routes in the star context have
>>>> separate route ids set in the blueprint xml.
>>>>
>>>> What might be causing this behavior and how should I fix this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Sneharghya
>>>
>>>
>