Fwd: svn commit: r432157

[Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com>]

Raymond,

Sorry to keep harping on the dependencies issue but I now see we have  
the webapp project dependent on the Axis binding and SDO. I realize  
you did not introduce the Axis dependency and asked last week why it  
was introduced but never received a response...I assume it was  
because of issues we have with resolving dependencies.

Could you please explain the issues that are forcing us down this  
path so we can find a solution? Significant hacks like this, if  
necessary, should really be discussed on the list prior to making  
them. Again, I am very uncomfortable with this as it appears we are  
loosing site of our modularity goal.

Jim


Begin forwarded message:

> From: rfeng@apache.org
> Date: August 16, 2006 10:47:48 PM PDT
> To: tuscany-commits@ws.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r432157 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca/ 
> runtime/webapp/src/main/resources/META-INF/sca: binding.axis2.scdl  
> composite.scdl databinding.sdo.scdl webapp.system.scdl
> Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>
> Author: rfeng
> Date: Wed Aug 16 22:47:47 2006
> New Revision: 432157
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=432157&view=rev
> Log:
> Integrate Axis2 and SDO databinding for Web Service
>
> Added:
>     incubator/tuscany/java/sca/runtime/webapp/src/main/resources/ 
> META-INF/sca/binding.axis2.scdl
>     incubator/tuscany/java/sca/runtime/webapp/src/main/resources/ 
> META-INF/sca/databinding.sdo.scdl
> Modified:
>     incubator/tuscany/java/sca/runtime/webapp/src/main/resources/ 
> META-INF/sca/composite.scdl
>     incubator/tuscany/java/sca/runtime/webapp/src/main/resources/ 
> META-INF/sca/webapp.system.scdl
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r432157

[Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>]

On Aug 17, 2006, at 12:28 AM, Jim Marino wrote:

> Raymond,
>
> Sorry to keep harping on the dependencies issue but I now see we  
> have the webapp project dependent on the Axis binding and SDO. I  
> realize you did not introduce the Axis dependency and asked last  
> week why it was introduced but never received a response...I assume  
> it was because of issues we have with resolving dependencies.
>
> Could you please explain the issues that are forcing us down this  
> path so we can find a solution? Significant hacks like this, if  
> necessary, should really be discussed on the list prior to making  
> them. Again, I am very uncomfortable with this as it appears we are  
> loosing site of our modularity goal.
>

It also doesn't work as the axis binding uses <dependency> elements  
that require the AritfactRepository to be running and that is not  
part of the primordial deployer. These really should be deployed as  
extensions.

A work-around might be to set the installDirectory in the RuntimeInfo  
for the webapp to the real path (as returned by getRealPath()) of an  
extension directory in the webapp e.g. WEB-INF/tuscany. This would be  
used by the DirectoryScanExtender as the base for resolving relative  
paths; with default config this would result in jars in WEB-INF/ 
tuscany/extension being loaded as extensions.

Just an idea - YMMV

--
Jeremy


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org