You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by ee7arh <an...@2e-systems.com> on 2009/03/31 17:19:48 UTC

Re: Active MQ broker embedded with spring configuration problems


Hi,

I had a very similar problem except that ActiveMQ complained because my
<persistenceAdapter> was declared after my <transportConnectors>.

When I put the <persistenceAdapter> first then all worked fine. What is
confusing is that on the ActiveMQ docs it has an example showing that this
will work the other way around:

http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html 

Is this actually a bug in ActiveMQ? Should I raise an issue?

Thanks
Andrew

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p22804988.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ broker embedded with spring configuration problems

Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.

Thanks Andrew!

On 6 May 2009, at 15:33, ee7arh wrote:

>
> Please also fix this page too:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html
>
> Order should be:
> networkConnectors
> persistenceAdapter
> transportConnectors
>
> Bregards
> Andrew
>
>
> Gary Tully wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira issue. I just updated  
>> that page
>> to fix the order. That page was produced before schema validation was
>> enabled. As the broker element is a sequence, order is important.
>>
>> You can see the xml schema at
>> http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html
>>
>> 2009/3/31 ee7arh <an...@2e-systems.com>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had a very similar problem except that ActiveMQ complained  
>>> because my
>>> <persistenceAdapter> was declared after my <transportConnectors>.
>>>
>>> When I put the <persistenceAdapter> first then all worked fine.  
>>> What is
>>> confusing is that on the ActiveMQ docs it has an example showing  
>>> that
>>> this
>>> will work the other way around:
>>>
>>> http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
>>> http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
>>>
>>> Is this actually a bug in ActiveMQ? Should I raise an issue?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p22804988.html
>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> http://blog.garytully.com
>>
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://FUSESource.com
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p23407600.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Re: Active MQ broker embedded with spring configuration problems

Posted by ee7arh <an...@2e-systems.com>.

Please also fix this page too:

http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html

Order should be:
networkConnectors
persistenceAdapter
transportConnectors

Bregards
Andrew


Gary Tully wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira issue. I just updated that page
> to fix the order. That page was produced before schema validation was
> enabled. As the broker element is a sequence, order is important.
> 
> You can see the xml schema at
> http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html
> 
> 2009/3/31 ee7arh <an...@2e-systems.com>
> 
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a very similar problem except that ActiveMQ complained because my
>> <persistenceAdapter> was declared after my <transportConnectors>.
>>
>> When I put the <persistenceAdapter> first then all worked fine. What is
>> confusing is that on the ActiveMQ docs it has an example showing that
>> this
>> will work the other way around:
>>
>> http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
>> http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
>>
>> Is this actually a bug in ActiveMQ? Should I raise an issue?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Andrew
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p22804988.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://blog.garytully.com
> 
> Open Source SOA
> http://FUSESource.com
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p23407600.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Active MQ broker embedded with spring configuration problems

Posted by Gary Tully <ga...@gmail.com>.

Hi Andrew, thanks. No need to raise a jira issue. I just updated that page
to fix the order. That page was produced before schema validation was
enabled. As the broker element is a sequence, order is important.

You can see the xml schema at http://activemq.apache.org/xml-reference.html

2009/3/31 ee7arh <an...@2e-systems.com>

>
>
> Hi,
>
> I had a very similar problem except that ActiveMQ complained because my
> <persistenceAdapter> was declared after my <transportConnectors>.
>
> When I put the <persistenceAdapter> first then all worked fine. What is
> confusing is that on the ActiveMQ docs it has an example showing that this
> will work the other way around:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
> http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
>
> Is this actually a bug in ActiveMQ? Should I raise an issue?
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-broker-embedded-with-spring-configuration-problems-tp15253117p22804988.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
http://blog.garytully.com

Open Source SOA
http://FUSESource.com