You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wink.apache.org by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com> on 2009/10/06 17:29:16 UTC
[discuss] Wink 1.0 status
All,
Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink JIRA,
I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be deferred.
Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed to
close the release.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's what I think needs to be finished:
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
I think this one is done, but will double check.
2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
Looks done, just needs to be closed.
3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release or
bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant, are
you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
later?
5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We can
fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
I'll get this one integrated today.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
Thanks,
-N
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
nlgallar@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
I think the related issue is WINK-192. I'll go ahead and apply the
patch that fixes part of the problem. The other problem I believe was
with the wink-json-provider which I think the easiest fix for now is
to wrap the UriInfo call in a try catch. As far as supporting
injection in the client side providers for other @Context types, I
think the story will be that we don't support it in the next release
because it may not work out logically in the provider.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> WINK-183 is almost done.
> There are some example build.xml that need to be verified.
> I hope to finish them tomorrow and close this one.
>
> WINK-166 is not really fixed. It provides a hotfix for NPE, but there should
> be another solution I guess.
> I think Bryant had opened a related issue.
> Anyway I think we can defer it to later release.
>
> Agree about the others.
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink JIRA,
>> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
>> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
>> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be deferred.
>>
>> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed to
>> close the release.
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
>>
>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
>>
>> I think this one is done, but will double check.
>>
>>
>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
>>
>> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
>>
>>
>> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
>>
>> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release or
>> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
>>
>>
>> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
>>
>> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant, are
>> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
>> later?
>>
>>
>> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
>>
>> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
>> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We can
>> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
>>
>>
>> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
>>
>> I'll get this one integrated today.
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -N
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Michael Elman <ta...@gmail.com>.
WINK-183 is almost done.
There are some example build.xml that need to be verified.
I hope to finish them tomorrow and close this one.
WINK-166 is not really fixed. It provides a hotfix for NPE, but there should
be another solution I guess.
I think Bryant had opened a related issue.
Anyway I think we can defer it to later release.
Agree about the others.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink JIRA,
> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be deferred.
>
> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed to
> close the release.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
>
> I think this one is done, but will double check.
>
>
> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
>
> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
>
>
> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
>
> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release or
> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
>
>
> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
>
> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant, are
> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
> later?
>
>
> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
>
> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We can
> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
>
>
> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
>
> I'll get this one integrated today.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -N
>
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
Ok, here's the problem. The release script is tagging from the trunk and
not the branch that has the properly configured poms.
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=823906&view=rev
Log:
[maven-scm] copy for tag wink-1.0-incubating
Added:
incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.0-incubating/
- copied from r823905, incubator/wink/trunk/
-Nick
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
nlgallar@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
Nicholas Gallardo
<nickgallardo@yah
oo.com> To
wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
10/10/2009 11:52 cc
AM
Subject
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Please respond to
wink-dev@incubato
r.apache.org
The poms in the branch are configured properly. I'll recreate the tag from
there and hopefully all will be well.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sat, October 10, 2009 11:46:42 AM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Yep, I see what you're saying. Based on the prompts of the script, I had
thought it was doing both (creating the 1.0-incubating release AND creating
the 1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars). But, your comment makes sense. Let me
see if I can get the right tag in there and all should be good.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: Bryant Luk <bl...@apache.org>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sat, October 10, 2009 11:33:00 AM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Hi Nick,
Just looking through the tag but a lot of the POMs have
1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT in the pom.xml version element in the
wink-1.0-incubating tag.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.0-incubating/pom.xml
Maybe it's showing up in Nexus as 1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT so it isn't
showing up in the staging area (since it has SNAPSHOT).
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
<nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
> Quick update...
>
> I've run through everything and it looks like the script is building the
> release properly. The only problem is that I can't see the release in the
> staging area of Nexus. The upload is definitely working as other stuff is
> being uploaded.
>
>
> -N
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Bryant Luk ---10/09/2009 02:57:05
> PM---I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed]Bryant
> Luk ---10/09/2009 02:57:05 PM---I've updated the release notes and added
in
> a fix contributed by Mike
>
>
> *Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>*
>
> 10/09/2009 02:56 PM
> Please respond to
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> To
>
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
> I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed by Mike
> for WINK-214 in trunk. Also, I believe I've made the required changes
> to LICENSE and NOTICES. If those changes are okay with you Nick, they
> should be merged into the branch.
>
> For the release notes, I refer back to wink-user instead of wink-dev
> for user issues/feedback. Described the layout of the distribution a
> bit more and added info about the wink-*.jars. Added some more links
> back to the project website and wiki.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
<nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink
> JIRA,
> >> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0.
I've
> >> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
> >> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be
> deferred.
> >>
> >> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed
> to
> >> close the release.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
> >>
> >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
> >>
> >> I think this one is done, but will double check.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
> >>
> >> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
> >>
> >>
> >> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
> >>
> >> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next
release
> or
> >> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
> >>
> >> Sure Nick. I just did the same. Converted the earlier sub-task
Wink-194
> > into a task by its own and closed the otherwise complete Wink-112.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shiva Kumar H R
> >
> >
> >> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
> >>
> >> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this.
Bryant,
> are
> >> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific
issues
> >> later?
> >>
> >>
> >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
> >>
> >> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
> >> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We
> can
> >> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
> >>
> >> I'll get this one integrated today.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> -N
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicholas Gallardo
> >> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> >> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> >> Phone: 512-286-6258
> >> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> >
>
>
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>.
The poms in the branch are configured properly. I'll recreate the tag from there and hopefully all will be well.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sat, October 10, 2009 11:46:42 AM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Yep, I see what you're saying. Based on the prompts of the script, I had thought it was doing both (creating the 1.0-incubating release AND creating the 1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars). But, your comment makes sense. Let me see if I can get the right tag in there and all should be good.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: Bryant Luk <bl...@apache.org>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sat, October 10, 2009 11:33:00 AM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Hi Nick,
Just looking through the tag but a lot of the POMs have
1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT in the pom.xml version element in the
wink-1.0-incubating tag.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.0-incubating/pom.xml
Maybe it's showing up in Nexus as 1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT so it isn't
showing up in the staging area (since it has SNAPSHOT).
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
> Quick update...
>
> I've run through everything and it looks like the script is building the
> release properly. The only problem is that I can't see the release in the
> staging area of Nexus. The upload is definitely working as other stuff is
> being uploaded.
>
>
> -N
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Bryant Luk ---10/09/2009 02:57:05
> PM---I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed]Bryant
> Luk ---10/09/2009 02:57:05 PM---I've updated the release notes and added in
> a fix contributed by Mike
>
>
> *Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>*
>
> 10/09/2009 02:56 PM
> Please respond to
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> To
>
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
> I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed by Mike
> for WINK-214 in trunk. Also, I believe I've made the required changes
> to LICENSE and NOTICES. If those changes are okay with you Nick, they
> should be merged into the branch.
>
> For the release notes, I refer back to wink-user instead of wink-dev
> for user issues/feedback. Described the layout of the distribution a
> bit more and added info about the wink-*.jars. Added some more links
> back to the project website and wiki.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink
> JIRA,
> >> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
> >> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
> >> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be
> deferred.
> >>
> >> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed
> to
> >> close the release.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
> >>
> >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
> >>
> >> I think this one is done, but will double check.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
> >>
> >> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
> >>
> >>
> >> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
> >>
> >> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release
> or
> >> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
> >>
> >> Sure Nick. I just did the same. Converted the earlier sub-task Wink-194
> > into a task by its own and closed the otherwise complete Wink-112.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shiva Kumar H R
> >
> >
> >> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
> >>
> >> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant,
> are
> >> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
> >> later?
> >>
> >>
> >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
> >>
> >> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
> >> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We
> can
> >> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
> >>
> >> I'll get this one integrated today.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> -N
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicholas Gallardo
> >> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> >> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> >> Phone: 512-286-6258
> >> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> >
>
>
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Nicholas Gallardo <ni...@yahoo.com>.
Yep, I see what you're saying. Based on the prompts of the script, I had thought it was doing both (creating the 1.0-incubating release AND creating the 1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT jars). But, your comment makes sense. Let me see if I can get the right tag in there and all should be good.
-N
----- Original Message ----
From: Bryant Luk <bl...@apache.org>
To: wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Sat, October 10, 2009 11:33:00 AM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Hi Nick,
Just looking through the tag but a lot of the POMs have
1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT in the pom.xml version element in the
wink-1.0-incubating tag.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.0-incubating/pom.xml
Maybe it's showing up in Nexus as 1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT so it isn't
showing up in the staging area (since it has SNAPSHOT).
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
> Quick update...
>
> I've run through everything and it looks like the script is building the
> release properly. The only problem is that I can't see the release in the
> staging area of Nexus. The upload is definitely working as other stuff is
> being uploaded.
>
>
> -N
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Bryant Luk ---10/09/2009 02:57:05
> PM---I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed]Bryant
> Luk ---10/09/2009 02:57:05 PM---I've updated the release notes and added in
> a fix contributed by Mike
>
>
> *Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>*
>
> 10/09/2009 02:56 PM
> Please respond to
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> To
>
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
> I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed by Mike
> for WINK-214 in trunk. Also, I believe I've made the required changes
> to LICENSE and NOTICES. If those changes are okay with you Nick, they
> should be merged into the branch.
>
> For the release notes, I refer back to wink-user instead of wink-dev
> for user issues/feedback. Described the layout of the distribution a
> bit more and added info about the wink-*.jars. Added some more links
> back to the project website and wiki.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink
> JIRA,
> >> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
> >> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
> >> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be
> deferred.
> >>
> >> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed
> to
> >> close the release.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
> >>
> >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
> >>
> >> I think this one is done, but will double check.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
> >>
> >> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
> >>
> >>
> >> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
> >>
> >> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release
> or
> >> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
> >>
> >> Sure Nick. I just did the same. Converted the earlier sub-task Wink-194
> > into a task by its own and closed the otherwise complete Wink-112.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shiva Kumar H R
> >
> >
> >> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
> >>
> >> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant,
> are
> >> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
> >> later?
> >>
> >>
> >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
> >>
> >> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
> >> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We
> can
> >> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
> >>
> >> I'll get this one integrated today.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> -N
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicholas Gallardo
> >> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> >> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> >> Phone: 512-286-6258
> >> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> >
>
>
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Bryant Luk <bl...@apache.org>.
Hi Nick,
Just looking through the tag but a lot of the POMs have
1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT in the pom.xml version element in the
wink-1.0-incubating tag.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.0-incubating/pom.xml
Maybe it's showing up in Nexus as 1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT so it isn't
showing up in the staging area (since it has SNAPSHOT).
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
> Quick update...
>
> I've run through everything and it looks like the script is building the
> release properly. The only problem is that I can't see the release in the
> staging area of Nexus. The upload is definitely working as other stuff is
> being uploaded.
>
>
> -N
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Bryant Luk ---10/09/2009 02:57:05
> PM---I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed]Bryant
> Luk ---10/09/2009 02:57:05 PM---I've updated the release notes and added in
> a fix contributed by Mike
>
>
> *Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>*
>
> 10/09/2009 02:56 PM
> Please respond to
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
>
> To
>
> wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
> I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed by Mike
> for WINK-214 in trunk. Also, I believe I've made the required changes
> to LICENSE and NOTICES. If those changes are okay with you Nick, they
> should be merged into the branch.
>
> For the release notes, I refer back to wink-user instead of wink-dev
> for user issues/feedback. Described the layout of the distribution a
> bit more and added info about the wink-*.jars. Added some more links
> back to the project website and wiki.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink
> JIRA,
> >> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
> >> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
> >> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be
> deferred.
> >>
> >> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed
> to
> >> close the release.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
> >>
> >> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
> >>
> >> I think this one is done, but will double check.
> >>
> >>
> >> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
> >>
> >> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
> >>
> >>
> >> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
> >>
> >> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release
> or
> >> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
> >>
> >> Sure Nick. I just did the same. Converted the earlier sub-task Wink-194
> > into a task by its own and closed the otherwise complete Wink-112.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shiva Kumar H R
> >
> >
> >> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
> >>
> >> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant,
> are
> >> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
> >> later?
> >>
> >>
> >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
> >>
> >> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
> >> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We
> can
> >> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
> >>
> >> I'll get this one integrated today.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> -N
> >>
> >>
> >> Nicholas Gallardo
> >> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> >> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> >> Phone: 512-286-6258
> >> Building: 903 / 5G-016
> >
>
>
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
Quick update...
I've run through everything and it looks like the script is building the
release properly. The only problem is that I can't see the release in the
staging area of Nexus. The upload is definitely working as other stuff is
being uploaded.
-N
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
nlgallar@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
Bryant Luk
<bryant.luk@gmail
.com> To
wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
10/09/2009 02:56 cc
PM
Subject
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Please respond to
wink-dev@incubato
r.apache.org
I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed by Mike
for WINK-214 in trunk. Also, I believe I've made the required changes
to LICENSE and NOTICES. If those changes are okay with you Nick, they
should be merged into the branch.
For the release notes, I refer back to wink-user instead of wink-dev
for user issues/feedback. Described the layout of the distribution a
bit more and added info about the wink-*.jars. Added some more links
back to the project website and wiki.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
<nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink
JIRA,
>> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
>> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
>> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be
deferred.
>>
>> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed
to
>> close the release.
>>
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
>>
>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
>>
>> I think this one is done, but will double check.
>>
>>
>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
>>
>> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
>>
>>
>> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
>>
>> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release
or
>> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
>>
>> Sure Nick. I just did the same. Converted the earlier sub-task Wink-194
> into a task by its own and closed the otherwise complete Wink-112.
>
> Thanks,
> Shiva Kumar H R
>
>
>> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
>>
>> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant,
are
>> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
>> later?
>>
>>
>> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
>>
>> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
>> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We
can
>> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
>>
>>
>> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
>>
>> I'll get this one integrated today.
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -N
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
Bryant,
> If those changes are okay with you Nick, they
> should be merged into the branch.
Yep, those changes are fine with me. I'll take a look at the diff and
merge it over.
I think we should be good to go to stage the release now.
-N
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
nlgallar@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
Bryant Luk
<bryant.luk@gmail
.com> To
wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
10/09/2009 02:56 cc
PM
Subject
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Please respond to
wink-dev@incubato
r.apache.org
I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed by Mike
for WINK-214 in trunk. Also, I believe I've made the required changes
to LICENSE and NOTICES. If those changes are okay with you Nick, they
should be merged into the branch.
For the release notes, I refer back to wink-user instead of wink-dev
for user issues/feedback. Described the layout of the distribution a
bit more and added info about the wink-*.jars. Added some more links
back to the project website and wiki.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo
<nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink
JIRA,
>> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
>> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
>> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be
deferred.
>>
>> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed
to
>> close the release.
>>
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
>>
>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
>>
>> I think this one is done, but will double check.
>>
>>
>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
>>
>> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
>>
>>
>> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
>>
>> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release
or
>> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
>>
>> Sure Nick. I just did the same. Converted the earlier sub-task Wink-194
> into a task by its own and closed the otherwise complete Wink-112.
>
> Thanks,
> Shiva Kumar H R
>
>
>> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
>>
>> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant,
are
>> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
>> later?
>>
>>
>> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
>>
>> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
>> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We
can
>> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
>>
>>
>> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
>>
>> I'll get this one integrated today.
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -N
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
I've updated the release notes and added in a fix contributed by Mike
for WINK-214 in trunk. Also, I believe I've made the required changes
to LICENSE and NOTICES. If those changes are okay with you Nick, they
should be merged into the branch.
For the release notes, I refer back to wink-user instead of wink-dev
for user issues/feedback. Described the layout of the distribution a
bit more and added info about the wink-*.jars. Added some more links
back to the project website and wiki.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> All,
>>
>> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink JIRA,
>> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
>> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
>> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be deferred.
>>
>> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed to
>> close the release.
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
>>
>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
>>
>> I think this one is done, but will double check.
>>
>>
>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
>>
>> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
>>
>>
>> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
>>
>> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release or
>> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
>>
>> Sure Nick. I just did the same. Converted the earlier sub-task Wink-194
> into a task by its own and closed the otherwise complete Wink-112.
>
> Thanks,
> Shiva Kumar H R
>
>
>> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
>>
>> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant, are
>> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
>> later?
>>
>>
>> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
>>
>> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
>> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We can
>> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
>>
>>
>> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
>>
>> I'll get this one integrated today.
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -N
>>
>>
>> Nicholas Gallardo
>> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
>> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
>> Phone: 512-286-6258
>> Building: 903 / 5G-016
>
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink JIRA,
> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be deferred.
>
> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed to
> close the release.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
>
> I think this one is done, but will double check.
>
>
> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
>
> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
>
>
> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
>
> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release or
> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
>
> Sure Nick. I just did the same. Converted the earlier sub-task Wink-194
into a task by its own and closed the otherwise complete Wink-112.
Thanks,
Shiva Kumar H R
> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
>
> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant, are
> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
> later?
>
>
> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
>
> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We can
> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
>
>
> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
>
> I'll get this one integrated today.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -N
>
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Nicholas L Gallardo <nl...@us.ibm.com>.
> but there's no definition of "done" for the right amount
Yep, my concern exactly... I'll close this one out and we can reopen as
necessary when we encounter new issues.
-N
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
nlgallar@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
Bryant Luk
<bryant.luk@gmail
.com> To
wink-dev@incubator.apache.org
10/06/2009 11:21 cc
AM
Subject
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Please respond to
wink-dev@incubato
r.apache.org
Also, as far as WINK-185 (adding trace), I think fixing it as we go is
probably the best so I don't see it as a blocking issue. There's more
debug trace on the wink-server side right now than there was
previously but there's no definition of "done" for the right amount of
traces (other than never enough for the current issue ;) ).
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo
<nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink
JIRA,
> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be deferred.
>
> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed to
> close the release.
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
>
> I think this one is done, but will double check.
>
>
> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
>
> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
>
>
> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
>
> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release
or
> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
>
>
> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
>
> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant,
are
> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
> later?
>
>
> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
>
> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We
can
> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
>
>
> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
>
> I'll get this one integrated today.
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -N
>
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016
Re: [discuss] Wink 1.0 status
Posted by Bryant Luk <br...@gmail.com>.
Also, as far as WINK-185 (adding trace), I think fixing it as we go is
probably the best so I don't see it as a blocking issue. There's more
debug trace on the wink-server side right now than there was
previously but there's no definition of "done" for the right amount of
traces (other than never enough for the current issue ;) ).
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo
<nl...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Of the items listed under the 0.2 release (should be 1.0) in the Wink JIRA,
> I don't think but a few should be closed out before releasing 1.0. I've
> included two lists below. The ones I think should be finished before
> cutting the release and a second list for the items that can be deferred.
>
> Please provide your thoughts on whether or not anything else is needed to
> close the release.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here's what I think needs to be finished:
>
> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-183
>
> I think this one is done, but will double check.
>
>
> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-166
>
> Looks done, just needs to be closed.
>
>
> 3. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-112
>
> Looks done except WINK-149. We can either move this to the next release or
> bump just WINK-194 and close out WINK-112.
>
>
> 4. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-185
>
> I believe there were already some changes checked in for this. Bryant, are
> you ok with closing this and just opening new JIRAs for specific issues
> later?
>
>
> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-192
>
> Don't know that we need to fix this one right now, but stating an
> intention/direction and documenting it in the JIRA should suffice. We can
> fix this in a point release to Wink 1.0.
>
>
> 6. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-211
>
> I'll get this one integrated today.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Here are the ones that I think can be deferred to the next release:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-174
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-141
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-67
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-68
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-149
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-79
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-170
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-97 (held up by WINK-68)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-158
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-128
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-135
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -N
>
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
> WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development
> nlgallar@us.ibm.com
> Phone: 512-286-6258
> Building: 903 / 5G-016