You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Amit Nithian (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/04/30 19:59:30 UTC

[jira] Created: (SOLR-1137) Improve package naming for DIH

Improve package naming for DIH
------------------------------

                 Key: SOLR-1137
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137
             Project: Solr
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
    Affects Versions: 1.3
            Reporter: Amit Nithian
            Priority: Minor


Currently all classes in the DIH are lumped into one package. I would like to propose a better package naming convention for the DIH:
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport => for those that don't fit into any of the other three but don't warrant their own package yet.
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.datasource
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.transformer
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.processor

Create a test folder and mirror the package names for test classes so that test classes are not lumped into src 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1137) Improve package naming for DIH

Posted by "Amit Nithian (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704910#action_12704910 ] 

Amit Nithian commented on SOLR-1137:
------------------------------------

I thought one of the bugs/features was to make DIH more API friendly so I figured this would be a good way to do so. Also, many of the comments indicate that the API is subject to change so I didn't think much of backwards compatibility due to this statement.

regarding the user seeing the benefit, the common end-user won't but from a developer's perspective, it just keeps the code more organized and cleaner.

> Improve package naming for DIH
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1137
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Amit Nithian
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently all classes in the DIH are lumped into one package. I would like to propose a better package naming convention for the DIH:
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport => for those that don't fit into any of the other three but don't warrant their own package yet.
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.datasource
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.transformer
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.processor
> Create a test folder and mirror the package names for test classes so that test classes are not lumped into src 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1137) Improve package naming for DIH

Posted by "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704907#action_12704907 ] 

Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1137:
----------------------------------

I see your point. But DIH is rarely used as an API. Will the user ever get to see any benefit? moreover it is going to be a non-back compat change

> Improve package naming for DIH
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1137
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Amit Nithian
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently all classes in the DIH are lumped into one package. I would like to propose a better package naming convention for the DIH:
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport => for those that don't fit into any of the other three but don't warrant their own package yet.
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.datasource
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.transformer
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.processor
> Create a test folder and mirror the package names for test classes so that test classes are not lumped into src 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.