You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org> on 2003/10/02 16:30:03 UTC
[vote] Change in block file-system layout
As emerged with the discussion on Merlin Blocks vs. Cocoon Blocks, it
has been asked that we avoid collission by moving our "proprietary"
information on a different location.
So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
/BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
/COCOON-INF/ was proposed but I like /COB-INF/ more since that
directory doesn't really contain information about cocoon but
information about the cocoon block, thus "COB".
Hopefully that will not conflict with some COBOL information directory.
--
Stefano.
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Giacomo Pati <gi...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> As emerged with the discussion on Merlin Blocks vs. Cocoon Blocks, it
> has been asked that we avoid collission by moving our "proprietary"
> information on a different location.
>
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
>
> /COCOON-INF/ was proposed but I like /COB-INF/ more since that
> directory doesn't really contain information about cocoon but
> information about the cocoon block, thus "COB".
>
> Hopefully that will not conflict with some COBOL information directory.
You're sooo sarcastic!
+1 to COB-INF
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Geoff Howard <co...@leverageweb.com>.
Tony Collen wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>>
>> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
>
> +1... onward to true blocks!
I am +1 because I agree we need to get going and there's not a clear
symbiosis at this time.
I am however concerned that we're closing the door to a future utopia of
interoperability both at the community level and the technical level.
The technical can be addressed later as needs and solutions solidify.
The community issues should be addressed now before they solidify.
Geoff
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Tony Collen <co...@umn.edu>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
[snip]
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1... onward to true blocks!
Tony
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Joerg Heinicke <jh...@virbus.de>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@vafer.org>.
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
--
Torsten
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Andrew Savory <an...@luminas.co.uk>.
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
Andrew.
--
Andrew Savory Email: andrew@luminas.co.uk
Managing Director Tel: +44 (0)870 741 6658
Luminas Internet Applications Fax: +44 (0)700 598 1135
Orixo alliance: http://www.orixo.com/ Web: www.luminas.co.uk
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Gianugo Rabellino <gi...@apache.org>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> As emerged with the discussion on Merlin Blocks vs. Cocoon Blocks, it
> has been asked that we avoid collission by moving our "proprietary"
> information on a different location.
>
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
>
+1
Ciao,
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
(Now blogging at: http://blogs.cocoondev.org/gianugo/)
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Sylvain Wallez <sy...@anyware-tech.com>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> As emerged with the discussion on Merlin Blocks vs. Cocoon Blocks, it
> has been asked that we avoid collission by moving our "proprietary"
> information on a different location.
>
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
--
Sylvain Wallez Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
Orixo, the opensource XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Steven Noels <st...@outerthought.org>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Hopefully that will not conflict with some COBOL information directory.
http://www.google.com/search?q=COB-INF
+1
</Steven>
--
Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML An Orixo Member
Read my weblog at http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org stevenn at apache.org
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Nicola Ken Barozzi <ni...@apache.org>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
...
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
...
> Hopefully that will not conflict with some COBOL information directory.
LOL! :-)
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
> +1. Without the microsoft CLI, it is fairly safe to assume that COBOL
> or COBOL.NET would not be a thread here.
>
s/thread/threat/
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> As emerged with the discussion on Merlin Blocks vs. Cocoon Blocks, it
> has been asked that we avoid collission by moving our "proprietary"
> information on a different location.
>
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
>
> /COCOON-INF/ was proposed but I like /COB-INF/ more since that directory
> doesn't really contain information about cocoon but information about
> the cocoon block, thus "COB".
>
> Hopefully that will not conflict with some COBOL information directory.
+1. Without the microsoft CLI, it is fairly safe to assume that COBOL
or COBOL.NET would not be a thread here.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agsoftware.dnsalias.com>.
Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
>
> On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 23:17 Europe/Rome, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>
>> Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
>>> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
>>
>> +1 Of course!
>>
>> Just for cosmetic:
>>
>> What about ACB-INF? or CB-INF?
>>
>> ACB means "Apache Cocon Block".
>
> "Cob" is easier to pronounce. ;-)
+1
Antonio Gallardo
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Berin Loritsch <bl...@apache.org>.
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
> Interesting stuff here:
>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cob
>
> I like the verb actually. Much more than one of the obsolete meanings ;-))
>
While we are at it, there are acronyms too:
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?p=dict&String=exact&Acronym=COB
I'd like this done by COB ;P
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Giacomo Pati <gi...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-
> query.asp?acronym=COB&String=exact&page=2
>
> even though I like "cranky old bastard"... expecially for times when
> the block won't work as expected ;-)
ROTFL
--
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
On Friday, Oct 3, 2003, at 16:41 Europe/Rome, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>> On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 23:17 Europe/Rome, Antonio Gallardo
>> wrote:
>>> Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
>>>
>>>> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 Of course!
>>>
>>> Just for cosmetic:
>>>
>>> What about ACB-INF? or CB-INF?
>>>
>>> ACB means "Apache Cocon Block".
>> "Cob" is easier to pronounce. ;-)
>
> Interesting stuff here:
>
> http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cob
>
> I like the verb actually. Much more than one of the obsolete meanings
> ;-))
or this
http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-
query.asp?acronym=COB&String=exact&page=2
even though I like "cranky old bastard"... expecially for times when
the block won't work as expected ;-)
--
Stefano.
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Gianugo Rabellino <gi...@apache.org>.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 23:17 Europe/Rome, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
>
>> Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
>>
>>> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
>>
>>
>> +1 Of course!
>>
>> Just for cosmetic:
>>
>> What about ACB-INF? or CB-INF?
>>
>> ACB means "Apache Cocon Block".
>
>
> "Cob" is easier to pronounce. ;-)
Interesting stuff here:
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=cob
I like the verb actually. Much more than one of the obsolete meanings ;-))
Ciao,
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. - http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
(Now blogging at: http://blogs.cocoondev.org/gianugo/)
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Stefano Mazzocchi <st...@apache.org>.
On Thursday, Oct 2, 2003, at 23:17 Europe/Rome, Antonio Gallardo wrote:
> Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
>> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
>
> +1 Of course!
>
> Just for cosmetic:
>
> What about ACB-INF? or CB-INF?
>
> ACB means "Apache Cocon Block".
"Cob" is easier to pronounce. ;-)
--
Stefano.
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agsoftware.dnsalias.com>.
Stefano Mazzocchi dijo:
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1 Of course!
Just for cosmetic:
What about ACB-INF? or CB-INF?
ACB means "Apache Cocon Block".
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
RE: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>.
From: Stefano Mazzocchi
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Jeremy Quinn <je...@media.demon.co.uk>.
On Thursday, October 2, 2003, at 03:30 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> As emerged with the discussion on Merlin Blocks vs. Cocoon Blocks, it
> has been asked that we avoid collission by moving our "proprietary"
> information on a different location.
>
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
regards Jeremy
RE: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
Carsten
Re: [vote] Change in block file-system layout
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
> So, as Berin suggested, vote on the proposed change:
>
> /BLOCK-INF/ -> /COB-INF/
+1
-Bertrand