You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Kevin Pilch-Bisson <ke...@pilch-bisson.net> on 2002/03/28 20:41:26 UTC
Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/unix sa_common.c sockets.c
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:17:02PM -0000, trawick@apache.org wrote:
>
> prototypes for the new function -- apr_set_sockaddr_vars() --
Wouldn't apr_sockaddr_vars_set be a more consistent name for the function?
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kevin Pilch-Bisson http://www.pilch-bisson.net
"Historically speaking, the presences of wheels in Unix
has never precluded their reinvention." - Larry Wall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: cvs commit: apr/network_io/unix sa_common.c sockets.c
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Kevin Pilch-Bisson <ke...@pilch-bisson.net> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:17:02PM -0000, trawick@apache.org wrote:
> >
> > prototypes for the new function -- apr_set_sockaddr_vars() --
>
> Wouldn't apr_sockaddr_vars_set be a more consistent name for the function?
It would be more consistent with the names of APR APIs, but this isn't
an API. I considered such a name before committing, but it seemed
uninteresting given given the lack of consistency in the names of other
helper functions.
But stupidly I've spent more time on this e-mail than it would take to
make the change so I'll do it (and update my patches for OS/2 and
Win32) :)
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net
Born in Roswell... married an alien...