You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ws.apache.org by Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> on 2010/10/18 19:46:38 UTC
Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for
XmlSchema
On 10/18/2010 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's possible
> to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
> up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier of
> could create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
> and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs doing
> in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
Are you talking about pushing just the content and therefore losing the SVN
history trail, or doing a move that retains the logs?
--G
Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for
XmlSchema
Posted by Nadir Amra <am...@us.ibm.com>.
+1
Nadir Amra
Integrated Web Services for IBM i Operating System
Internet: amra@us.ibm.com
Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote on 10/18/2010 01:18:56 PM:
> From: Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
> To: general@ws.apache.org
> Date: 10/18/2010 01:20 PM
> Subject: Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture
> moving for XmlSchema
>
> +1 from me!
>
> On 10/18/2010 2:01 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > svn mv. no loss of history.
> >
> > On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>
wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/18/2010 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> >>> Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's
possible
> >>> to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
> >>> up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier
of
> >>> could create a
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
> >>> and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs
doing
> >>> in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
> >>
> >> Are you talking about pushing just the content and therefore losing
the SVN
> >> history trail, or doing a move that retains the logs?
> >>
> >> --G
Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for
XmlSchema
Posted by Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>.
+1 from me!
On 10/18/2010 2:01 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> svn mv. no loss of history.
>
> On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/18/2010 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's possible
>>> to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
>>> up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier of
>>> could create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
>>> and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs doing
>>> in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
>>
>> Are you talking about pushing just the content and therefore losing the SVN
>> history trail, or doing a move that retains the logs?
>>
>> --G
Re: A much smaller and more focused bit of svn furniture moving for XmlSchema
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
svn mv. no loss of history.
On Oct 18, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/2010 11:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> Before XML Schema 2.0, I'd like to do some tree surgery. It's possible
>> to do in place, but my past experience is that svn bugs tend to blow
>> up in my face when I try stuff like this. It would be a lot easier of
>> could create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/xmlschema,
>> and push the trunk into there, than try to do what I think needs doing
>> in place. I would *not* touch the 1.4 branch.
>
> Are you talking about pushing just the content and therefore losing the SVN
> history trail, or doing a move that retains the logs?
>
> --G