You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@groovy.apache.org by Paolo Di Tommaso <pa...@gmail.com> on 2017/11/24 20:16:10 UTC
ConfigSlurper issue
It was my understanding that a ConfigObject dot notation is equivalent to
curly brackets.
However the following snippets create two different objects
def first = '''
alpha.container = 'foo'
profiles {
beta.container='x/y'
delta.container='1/2'
alpha.container='bar'
}
'''
def second = '''
alpha.container = 'foo'
profiles.beta.container='x/y'
profiles.delta.container='1/2'
profiles.alpha.container='bar'
'''
assert new ConfigSlurper().parse(first) == new
ConfigSlurper().parse(second) // fail
in particular printing the first ConfigObject it return the following
string:
alpha.container='bar'
profiles {
beta.container='x/y'
delta.container='1/2'
}
that doesn't make much sense. Is this a bug or I'm missing something?
Cheers,
Paolo
Re: ConfigSlurper issue
Posted by Paolo Di Tommaso <pa...@gmail.com>.
I've opened an issue for this problem.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-8390
I've also tried to debug it, but I was unable to find a solution. Any help
would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Paolo
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Paolo Di Tommaso <paolo.ditommaso@gmail.com
> wrote:
> It was my understanding that a ConfigObject dot notation is equivalent to
> curly brackets.
>
> However the following snippets create two different objects
>
>
> def first = '''
> alpha.container = 'foo'
>
> profiles {
> beta.container='x/y'
> delta.container='1/2'
> alpha.container='bar'
> }
> '''
>
> def second = '''
> alpha.container = 'foo'
>
> profiles.beta.container='x/y'
> profiles.delta.container='1/2'
> profiles.alpha.container='bar'
> '''
>
> assert new ConfigSlurper().parse(first) == new
> ConfigSlurper().parse(second) // fail
>
>
>
> in particular printing the first ConfigObject it return the following
> string:
>
>
> alpha.container='bar'
> profiles {
> beta.container='x/y'
> delta.container='1/2'
> }
>
>
> that doesn't make much sense. Is this a bug or I'm missing something?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Paolo
>
>
>