You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> on 2010/06/23 11:24:46 UTC
[VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
The tag has been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
The staging repo is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
repository for your convenience:
http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/
We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
longer than the 72-hour minimum.
[ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
[ ] 0 no opinion
[ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
Rick
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>.
+1, can be built and start successfully.
-Rex
2010/6/23 Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. This
> version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an upgrade
> to the spring framework dependency.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>
> The staging repo is here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging repository
> for your convenience:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/>
>
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Rick
>
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Ashish Jain <as...@gmail.com>.
I was able to build and run a few sample applications. It looks fine. My +1.
--Ashish
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. This
>> version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an upgrade
>> to the spring framework dependency.
>>
>> The tag has been created here:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>>
>> The staging repo is here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging repository
>> for your convenience:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/>
>>
>> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
>> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>>
>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vamsi
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. This
> version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an upgrade
> to the spring framework dependency.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>
> The staging repo is here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging repository
> for your convenience:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/>
>
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Rick
>
--
Vamsi
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1 (pending TCK)
Jay
On 06/23/2010 04:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
> upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>
> The staging repo is here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>
> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
> repository for your convenience:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/
>
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Rick
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1
Sig, checksums, legal files, source, build, testsuite -- all look good.
--kevan
On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>
> The staging repo is here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging repository for your convenience:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/
>
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Rick
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Rex Wang <rw...@gmail.com>.
>From 2.1.5, we need to use maven 2.2.1 to build.
2010/7/2 Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>
> Rick,
>
> I notice that using maven-2.0.9 to build the tag results in the following
> build error.
>
> C:\G\server\tags\geronimo-2.1.6>mvn install
> [INFO] Scanning for projects...
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] FATAL ERROR
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).
>
>
> Project ID: org.apache.geronimo:geronimo
> POM Location: C:\G\server\tags\geronimo-2.1.6\pom.xml
>
> Reason: The POM expression: ${version} could not be evaluated. Reason:
> Expression value '${version}' references itself in
> 'org.apache.geronimo:geronimo:pom:2
>
>
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Trace
> org.apache.maven.reactor.MavenExecutionException: The POM expression:
> ${version} could not be evaluated. Reason: Expression value '${version}'
> references its
> at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:378)
> at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:292)
> at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129)
> at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:287)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> at
> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
> at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
> at
> org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
> at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
> Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.InvalidProjectModelException: The POM
> expression: ${version} could not be evaluated. Reason: Expression value
> '${version}
> at
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:882)
> at
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildFromSourceFileInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:506)
> at
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.build(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:198)
> at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProject(DefaultMaven.java:583)
> at
> org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.collectProjects(DefaultMaven.java:461)
> at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:365)
> ... 11 more
> Caused by:
> org.apache.maven.project.interpolation.ModelInterpolationException: The POM
> expression: ${version} could not be evaluated. Reason: Expression valu
> at
> org.apache.maven.project.interpolation.RegexBasedModelInterpolator.interpolateInternal(RegexBasedModelInterpolator.java:172)
> at
> org.apache.maven.project.interpolation.RegexBasedModelInterpolator.interpolate(RegexBasedModelInterpolator.java:98)
> at
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.processProjectLogic(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:1016)
> at
> org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:878)
> ... 16 more
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 1 second
> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Jul 01 23:50:08 IST 2010
> [INFO] Final Memory: 1M/4M
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Should we up the allowed maven versions in the root pom?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/1/2010 9:22 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>> Has the voting finished? I didn't see a [RESULTS] reply yet...
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I was waiting for the TCK results, and then got busy on some other
>> tasks. I probably won't be able to handle finishing up the release until
>> Tuesday.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>>
>>> On 6/23/10 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
>>>> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
>>>> upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>>>>
>>>> The tag has been created here:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>>>>
>>>> The staging repo is here:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>>>>
>>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>>>>
>>>> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
>>>> repository for your convenience:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/>
>>>>
>>>> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
>>>> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Vamsi
>
--
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
Rick,
I notice that using maven-2.0.9 to build the tag results in the following
build error.
C:\G\server\tags\geronimo-2.1.6>mvn install
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).
Project ID: org.apache.geronimo:geronimo
POM Location: C:\G\server\tags\geronimo-2.1.6\pom.xml
Reason: The POM expression: ${version} could not be evaluated. Reason:
Expression value '${version}' references itself in
'org.apache.geronimo:geronimo:pom:2
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Trace
org.apache.maven.reactor.MavenExecutionException: The POM expression:
${version} could not be evaluated. Reason: Expression value '${version}'
references its
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:378)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:292)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:129)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:287)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
at
org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Caused by: org.apache.maven.project.InvalidProjectModelException: The POM
expression: ${version} could not be evaluated. Reason: Expression value
'${version}
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:882)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildFromSourceFileInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:506)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.build(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:198)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProject(DefaultMaven.java:583)
at
org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.collectProjects(DefaultMaven.java:461)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.getProjects(DefaultMaven.java:365)
... 11 more
Caused by:
org.apache.maven.project.interpolation.ModelInterpolationException: The POM
expression: ${version} could not be evaluated. Reason: Expression valu
at
org.apache.maven.project.interpolation.RegexBasedModelInterpolator.interpolateInternal(RegexBasedModelInterpolator.java:172)
at
org.apache.maven.project.interpolation.RegexBasedModelInterpolator.interpolate(RegexBasedModelInterpolator.java:98)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.processProjectLogic(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:1016)
at
org.apache.maven.project.DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.buildInternal(DefaultMavenProjectBuilder.java:878)
... 16 more
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 1 second
[INFO] Finished at: Thu Jul 01 23:50:08 IST 2010
[INFO] Final Memory: 1M/4M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should we up the allowed maven versions in the root pom?
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/1/2010 9:22 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Has the voting finished? I didn't see a [RESULTS] reply yet...
>>
>>
>
> Sorry, I was waiting for the TCK results, and then got busy on some other
> tasks. I probably won't be able to handle finishing up the release until
> Tuesday.
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 6/23/10 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>
>>> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
>>> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
>>> upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>>>
>>> The tag has been created here:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>>>
>>> The staging repo is here:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>>>
>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>>>
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
>>> repository for your convenience:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/>
>>>
>>> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
>>> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Vamsi
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
On 7/1/2010 9:22 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Has the voting finished? I didn't see a [RESULTS] reply yet...
>
Sorry, I was waiting for the TCK results, and then got busy on some
other tasks. I probably won't be able to handle finishing up the
release until Tuesday.
Rick
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 6/23/10 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
>> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
>> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
>> upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>>
>> The tag has been created here:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>>
>> The staging repo is here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>>
>> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
>> repository for your convenience:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/
>>
>> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
>> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>>
>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Has the voting finished? I didn't see a [RESULTS] reply yet...
-Donald
On 6/23/10 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
> upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>
> The staging repo is here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>
> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
> repository for your convenience:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/
>
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Rick
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
+1
I have run the Java EE 5 TCK testing, all passed.
2010/6/29 Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> +1
> Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat JEE5 server.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 6/23/10 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> > A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
> > This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
> > upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
> >
> > The tag has been created here:
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
> >
> > The staging repo is here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
> >
> > The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
> >
> > The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
> > repository for your convenience:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/<http://people.apache.org/%7Erickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/>
> >
> > We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
> > longer than the 72-hour minimum.
> >
> > [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> > [ ] 0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
> >
> > Rick
> >
>
--
Ivan
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1
Was able to build the tag and start the Tomcat JEE5 server.
-Donald
On 6/23/10 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
> upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>
> The staging repo is here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>
> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
> repository for your convenience:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/
>
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for
> longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Rick
>
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Mark result in subject -- fulfilling my obsessive compulsive tendencies...
--kevan
On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> The vote to release 2.1.6 passes with xx +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. Voting +1 were
>
> Rick McGuire
> Jay D. McHugh
> Kevan Miller
> Donald Woods
> Hai Hong Xu (Ivan)
> Rex Wang
> Vamsavardhana Reddy
> Ashish Jain
>
> The artifacts will be promoted today and the download links updated accordingly.
>
> Rick
>
> On 6/23/2010 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged. This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>>
>> The tag has been created here:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>>
>> The staging repo is here:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>>
>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging repository for your convenience:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/
>>
>> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open for longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>>
>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>
>> Rick
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.6 - second attempt.
Posted by Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>.
The vote to release 2.1.6 passes with xx +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes.
Voting +1 were
Rick McGuire
Jay D. McHugh
Kevan Miller
Donald Woods
Hai Hong Xu (Ivan)
Rex Wang
Vamsavardhana Reddy
Ashish Jain
The artifacts will be promoted today and the download links updated
accordingly.
Rick
On 6/23/2010 5:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
> This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for
> an upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6
>
> The staging repo is here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.tar.gz
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.6/geronimo-2.1.6-source-release.zip
>
> The distribution artifacts have been copied to a second staging
> repository for your convenience:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rickmcguire/staging-repo/2.1.6/
>
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck, so the vote may be open
> for longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [ ] 0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>
> Rick