Jackrabbit 2.3 performance test sub project

[Serge Huber <sh...@jahia.com>]

Hi guys, 

I have taken the liberty of committing a sub-project for Jackrabbit 2.3 because I needed it to validate a patch that we've been working on.

I have also updated the README.txt file to add instructions on how to run the plot.sh script under Mac OS X.

I haven't added the compatibility sub-project yet though, as I didn't need it immediately and I saw that there isn't one for 2.2, is that normal ?

Best regards,
  Serge Huber.

Re: Jackrabbit 2.3 performance test sub project

[Serge Huber <sh...@jahia.com>]

On 17 déc. 2010, at 11:42, Jukka Zitting wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> From: Serge Huber [mailto:shuber2@jahia.com]
>> I have taken the liberty of committing a sub-project for Jackrabbit 2.3
>> because I needed it to validate a patch that we've been working on.
> 
> Excellent, thanks! We should probably also set the jackrabbit22 performance test to always use version 2.2.0 instead of a snapshot now that the release is out.

Ok I've just committed that.

Btw did you see my comment about porting the patch to Jackrabbit 2.2 for JCR-2835. I realize I asked the question before others so that wasn't very clear :) 

"Serge Huber commented on JCR-2835:
----------------------------------

Thanks Jukka, will you take care of the backport or should I do it ?

Regards,
 Serge... "

Best regards,
  Serge Huber.

RE: Jackrabbit 2.3 performance test sub project

[Jukka Zitting <jz...@adobe.com>]

Hi,

From: Serge Huber [mailto:shuber2@jahia.com]
> I have taken the liberty of committing a sub-project for Jackrabbit 2.3
> because I needed it to validate a patch that we've been working on.

Excellent, thanks! We should probably also set the jackrabbit22 performance test to always use version 2.2.0 instead of a snapshot now that the release is out.

> I have also updated the README.txt file to add instructions on how to
> run the plot.sh script under Mac OS X.

+1

> I haven't added the compatibility sub-project yet though, as I didn't
> need it immediately and I saw that there isn't one for 2.2, is that
> normal ?

We should add a compatibility test for 2.2 too, but as you said, it's not terribly urgent.

BR,

Jukka Zitting