You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Srinath Perera <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk> on 2003/10/21 15:06:59 UTC
JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Hi All,
we notice there is no JSR109 implementation in Apache and geranimo
project required such implementation as well.
We are planing to do a JSR I09 implementation. We would be very much
happy to do it with Apache Software Foundation if possible. We hope to
implement it on top of axis.
Any help extended or comments posted from the Apache developer community
will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Srianth,Chathura,Priyanaga and Dasarath
Lanka Software Foundation.
>> to the gerenimo group
this is written with related to [WS-AXIS] Axis & geronimo integration
and it sounds like dozen people who like to join a JSR109 implementaion
effort
RE: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>.
Hi Ias
Nice to here from you,
welcome to the JSR109 other things are OK .. for the WSDL -> X staff
I would like to (we shall decide ) reuse WSDL2Java staff as much as possible.
Acually WSDL2Java is refactoring to use JAXME right now. I am working on it and will
post a mail about it most probebly today. Why don't you give us a hand to finish
it off. Then we reuse that code (wsdl parsing part) in JSR109impl.
To say go ahead with JSR staff just give me time till things settled.
thanks
Srinath
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 08:16, Ias wrote:
> I'd like to work on the JAX-RPC mapping part of the JSR. Here's what I'm
> planning for that:
>
> org.apache.axis.ws4j2ee.jaxrpcmapping has
> WsdlToJ2ee, J2eeEmitter and J2eeXXXWriters for generating Java codes based
> on WSDL and JAX-RPC mapping descriptor defined in the JSR. JaxMe is
> utilized for reading the descriptor.
>
> This module can be used in a stand-alone manner like WSDL2Java or invoked
> by some other higher-level tools for JSR 109.
>
> I already started to implement the JaxMe part of the module, and it will
> take a couple of weeks because of JaxMe's unimplemented things (I'm now
> working on them). Then, the rest part will be finished very soon as I have
> the generators done with Sun's JAXB RI at the same time.
>
> Thanks for your response in advance,
>
> Ias
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:07 AM
> > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > Cc: dims@apache.org; Dasarath Weeratunge; Ranjith Priyanga;
> > Chathura Herath; sanjiva@watson.ibm.com;
> > geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jeremy.Lemaire@online.fr;
> > ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu; damitha@opensource.lk;
> > sanjayas@opensource.lk; hemapani@opensource.lk;
> > Guillaume.Sauthier@Bull.Net; jasnell@us.ibm.com;
> > dug@us.ibm.com; gdaniels@macromedia.com; tomj@macromedia.com;
> > steve_l@iseran.com; Richard@Monson-Haefel.com; garyp@firstech.com
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > we notice there is no JSR109 implementation in Apache and
> > geranimo project required such implementation as well.
> >
> > We are planing to do a JSR I09 implementation. We would be
> > very much happy to do it with Apache Software Foundation if
> > possible. We hope to implement it on top of axis.
> >
> > Any help extended or comments posted from the Apache
> > developer community will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Srianth,Chathura,Priyanaga and Dasarath Lanka Software Foundation.
> >
> > >> to the gerenimo group
> >
> > this is written with related to [WS-AXIS] Axis & geronimo
> > integration and it sounds like dozen people who like to join
> > a JSR109 implementaion effort
> >
> >
>
RE: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Ias <ia...@apache-korea.org>.
I'd like to work on the JAX-RPC mapping part of the JSR. Here's what I'm
planning for that:
org.apache.axis.ws4j2ee.jaxrpcmapping has
WsdlToJ2ee, J2eeEmitter and J2eeXXXWriters for generating Java codes based
on WSDL and JAX-RPC mapping descriptor defined in the JSR. JaxMe is
utilized for reading the descriptor.
This module can be used in a stand-alone manner like WSDL2Java or invoked
by some other higher-level tools for JSR 109.
I already started to implement the JaxMe part of the module, and it will
take a couple of weeks because of JaxMe's unimplemented things (I'm now
working on them). Then, the rest part will be finished very soon as I have
the generators done with Sun's JAXB RI at the same time.
Thanks for your response in advance,
Ias
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 6:07 AM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Cc: dims@apache.org; Dasarath Weeratunge; Ranjith Priyanga;
> Chathura Herath; sanjiva@watson.ibm.com;
> geronimo-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jeremy.Lemaire@online.fr;
> ammulder@alumni.princeton.edu; damitha@opensource.lk;
> sanjayas@opensource.lk; hemapani@opensource.lk;
> Guillaume.Sauthier@Bull.Net; jasnell@us.ibm.com;
> dug@us.ibm.com; gdaniels@macromedia.com; tomj@macromedia.com;
> steve_l@iseran.com; Richard@Monson-Haefel.com; garyp@firstech.com
>
> Hi All,
>
> we notice there is no JSR109 implementation in Apache and
> geranimo project required such implementation as well.
>
> We are planing to do a JSR I09 implementation. We would be
> very much happy to do it with Apache Software Foundation if
> possible. We hope to implement it on top of axis.
>
> Any help extended or comments posted from the Apache
> developer community will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Srianth,Chathura,Priyanaga and Dasarath Lanka Software Foundation.
>
> >> to the gerenimo group
>
> this is written with related to [WS-AXIS] Axis & geronimo
> integration and it sounds like dozen people who like to join
> a JSR109 implementaion effort
>
>
AW: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Thomas Bayer <ba...@oio.de>.
Hi,
> Just a question :
> how Axis can use his WSDD to handle jaxrpc mapping informations ???
> Does something already exists ?
it looks like that a jaxrpc mapping:
<java-wsdl-mapping>
<package-mapping>
<package-type>com.company.some.package</package-type>
<namespaceURI>http://package.some.company.com</namespaceURI>
</package-mapping>
<java-xml-type-mapping>
<class-type>com.company.some.package.AKlasse</class-type>
<!-- WSDL QName -->
<root-type-qname>
<namespaceURI>http://package.some.company.com</namespaceURI>
<localpart>AKlasse</localpart>
</root-type-qname>
<qname-scope>complexType</qname-scope>
</java-xml-type-mapping>
</java-wsdl-mapping>
could be mapped to a beanMapping.
<beanMapping qname="tns:AKlasse" xmlns:tns="http://package.some.company.com"
languageSpecificType="com.company.some.package.AKlasse">
</beanMapping>
Also the information about the remote and home Interfaces could be gathered
from the ejb-jar.xml and be placed in a service using the EJBProvider with
correspondending parameters.
A tool for the mapping doesn't exit yet. But I guess its possible. I think
things like handlers ( see 6. Handler ) and the propagation of the
MessageContext ( see 6.4.2. EJB Web service method invocation ) are much
harder.
Thomas
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Guillaume.Sauthier@Bull.Net [mailto:Guillaume.Sauthier@Bull.Net]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2003 11:36
> An: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a question :
> how Axis can use his WSDD to handle jaxrpc mapping informations ???
> Does something already exists ?
>
> Guillaume
>
> Thomas Bayer wrote:
> >
> > > our current idea about the implementation is to write a tool that read
> > > deployment discriptor(s) and (wsdl or EJB) and generate a webservice
> > > that wrap the EJB. (a web service that do the lookup and map
> webservice
> > > SEI methods to the EJB ... )
> > >
> > > I think we should start a discussion on axis-dev mailing list,
> >
> > A tool reading the descriptors is a good idea. Axis has already
> a provider
> > for EJB and can handle some things in WSDD deployment
> descriptors. So a tool
> > can read webservices.xml, the jax-rpc Mapping file, web.xml and
> ejb-jar.xml
> > and generate an Axis WSDD descriptor. Besides the converter a few things
> > should be done for example a provider for Servlet Endpoints.
> >
> > Thomas
>
Re: AW: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Guillaume Sauthier <Gu...@Bull.Net>.
Hi,
Just a question :
how Axis can use his WSDD to handle jaxrpc mapping informations ???
Does something already exists ?
Guillaume
Thomas Bayer wrote:
>
> > our current idea about the implementation is to write a tool that read
> > deployment discriptor(s) and (wsdl or EJB) and generate a webservice
> > that wrap the EJB. (a web service that do the lookup and map webservice
> > SEI methods to the EJB ... )
> >
> > I think we should start a discussion on axis-dev mailing list,
>
> A tool reading the descriptors is a good idea. Axis has already a provider
> for EJB and can handle some things in WSDD deployment descriptors. So a tool
> can read webservices.xml, the jax-rpc Mapping file, web.xml and ejb-jar.xml
> and generate an Axis WSDD descriptor. Besides the converter a few things
> should be done for example a provider for Servlet Endpoints.
>
> Thomas
AW: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Thomas Bayer <ba...@oio.de>.
> our current idea about the implementation is to write a tool that read
> deployment discriptor(s) and (wsdl or EJB) and generate a webservice
> that wrap the EJB. (a web service that do the lookup and map webservice
> SEI methods to the EJB ... )
>
> I think we should start a discussion on axis-dev mailing list,
A tool reading the descriptors is a good idea. Axis has already a provider
for EJB and can handle some things in WSDD deployment descriptors. So a tool
can read webservices.xml, the jax-rpc Mapping file, web.xml and ejb-jar.xml
and generate an Axis WSDD descriptor. Besides the converter a few things
should be done for example a provider for Servlet Endpoints.
Thomas
Re: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>.
Hi,
Thanks for the answer,
>I have plans to start working on this issue again (I had to break for
>other business) along with integration of Axis with Geronimo this
>week. I think it would be helpful to have a Wiki that address this.
Myp lan for Geronimo
> is to use Axis as the foundation for Geronimo's support for Web services as
> described by JSR 109, so I think some of the work will be done to the Axis
> code base and some in the Geronimo. For example, enhancing JAX-RPC so that
> its JSR 109 compliant would happen in the Axis code base, but implementation
> of Enterprise JavaBeans Endpoints would be done in Geronimo too. I'll start
> tuning into the Axis mailing list - axis-dev right?
>
yes, I think this is the my picture as well, to be bit specific
our current idea about the implementation is to write a tool that read
deployment discriptor(s) and (wsdl or EJB) and generate a webservice
that wrap the EJB. (a web service that do the lookup and map webservice
SEI methods to the EJB ... )
I think we should start a discussion on axis-dev mailing list,
Srinath
###################################################################################
BTW
Luis Avila from the geranimo answered (mail is below) here is my answer,
our current idea about the implementation is to write a tool that read
deployment discriptor(s) and (wsdl or EJB) and generate a webservice
that wrap the EJB. (a web service that do the lookup and map webservice
SEI methods to the EJB ... )
How we find the expectations of the JSR109 from the devloper community
of the axis and geranimo. Shall we start a discussion on the both dev
lists about the expectations and the high level architecture of a JSR109
Impl and any other issuse(if there are any).
##Luis Avila from the geranimo answered #############################
> Hello
>
> Me and Jeremy Lemaire are in axis-geronimo integration team, it'll be
> very good to coordinating ourselves to implementing the JSR-109 in axis
> and integrating it on geronimo.
>
########################################################################
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 10:22, Richard Monson-Haefel wrote:
> I have plans to start working on this issue again (I had to break for other
> business) along with integration of Axis with Geronimo this week. I think
> it would be helpful to have a Wiki that address this. My plan for Geronimo
> is to use Axis as the foundation for Geronimo's support for Web services as
> described by JSR 109, so I think some of the work will be done to the Axis
> code base and some in the Geronimo. For example, enhancing JAX-RPC so that
> its JSR 109 compliant would happen in the Axis code base, but implementation
> of Enterprise JavaBeans Endpoints would be done in Geronimo too. I'll start
> tuning into the Axis mailing list - axis-dev right?
>
> On 10/21/03 8:06 AM, "Srinath Perera" <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > we notice there is no JSR109 implementation in Apache and geranimo
> > project required such implementation as well.
> >
> > We are planing to do a JSR I09 implementation. We would be very much
> > happy to do it with Apache Software Foundation if possible. We hope to
> > implement it on top of axis.
> >
> > Any help extended or comments posted from the Apache developer community
> > will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Srianth,Chathura,Priyanaga and Dasarath
> > Lanka Software Foundation.
> >
> >>> to the gerenimo group
> >
> > this is written with related to [WS-AXIS] Axis & geronimo integration
> > and it sounds like dozen people who like to join a JSR109 implementaion
> > effort
> >
> >
> >
Re: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>.
Hi,
Thanks for the answer,
>I have plans to start working on this issue again (I had to break for
>other business) along with integration of Axis with Geronimo this
>week. I think it would be helpful to have a Wiki that address this.
Myp lan for Geronimo
> is to use Axis as the foundation for Geronimo's support for Web services as
> described by JSR 109, so I think some of the work will be done to the Axis
> code base and some in the Geronimo. For example, enhancing JAX-RPC so that
> its JSR 109 compliant would happen in the Axis code base, but implementation
> of Enterprise JavaBeans Endpoints would be done in Geronimo too. I'll start
> tuning into the Axis mailing list - axis-dev right?
>
yes, I think this is the my picture as well, to be bit specific
our current idea about the implementation is to write a tool that read
deployment discriptor(s) and (wsdl or EJB) and generate a webservice
that wrap the EJB. (a web service that do the lookup and map webservice
SEI methods to the EJB ... )
I think we should start a discussion on axis-dev mailing list,
Srinath
###################################################################################
BTW
Luis Avila from the geranimo answered (mail is below) here is my answer,
our current idea about the implementation is to write a tool that read
deployment discriptor(s) and (wsdl or EJB) and generate a webservice
that wrap the EJB. (a web service that do the lookup and map webservice
SEI methods to the EJB ... )
How we find the expectations of the JSR109 from the devloper community
of the axis and geranimo. Shall we start a discussion on the both dev
lists about the expectations and the high level architecture of a JSR109
Impl and any other issuse(if there are any).
##Luis Avila from the geranimo answered #############################
> Hello
>
> Me and Jeremy Lemaire are in axis-geronimo integration team, it'll be
> very good to coordinating ourselves to implementing the JSR-109 in axis
> and integrating it on geronimo.
>
########################################################################
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 10:22, Richard Monson-Haefel wrote:
> I have plans to start working on this issue again (I had to break for other
> business) along with integration of Axis with Geronimo this week. I think
> it would be helpful to have a Wiki that address this. My plan for Geronimo
> is to use Axis as the foundation for Geronimo's support for Web services as
> described by JSR 109, so I think some of the work will be done to the Axis
> code base and some in the Geronimo. For example, enhancing JAX-RPC so that
> its JSR 109 compliant would happen in the Axis code base, but implementation
> of Enterprise JavaBeans Endpoints would be done in Geronimo too. I'll start
> tuning into the Axis mailing list - axis-dev right?
>
> On 10/21/03 8:06 AM, "Srinath Perera" <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > we notice there is no JSR109 implementation in Apache and geranimo
> > project required such implementation as well.
> >
> > We are planing to do a JSR I09 implementation. We would be very much
> > happy to do it with Apache Software Foundation if possible. We hope to
> > implement it on top of axis.
> >
> > Any help extended or comments posted from the Apache developer community
> > will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Srianth,Chathura,Priyanaga and Dasarath
> > Lanka Software Foundation.
> >
> >>> to the gerenimo group
> >
> > this is written with related to [WS-AXIS] Axis & geronimo integration
> > and it sounds like dozen people who like to join a JSR109 implementaion
> > effort
> >
> >
> >
Re: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Richard Monson-Haefel <Ri...@Monson-Haefel.com>.
I have plans to start working on this issue again (I had to break for other
business) along with integration of Axis with Geronimo this week. I think
it would be helpful to have a Wiki that address this. My plan for Geronimo
is to use Axis as the foundation for Geronimo's support for Web services as
described by JSR 109, so I think some of the work will be done to the Axis
code base and some in the Geronimo. For example, enhancing JAX-RPC so that
its JSR 109 compliant would happen in the Axis code base, but implementation
of Enterprise JavaBeans Endpoints would be done in Geronimo too. I'll start
tuning into the Axis mailing list - axis-dev right?
On 10/21/03 8:06 AM, "Srinath Perera" <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> we notice there is no JSR109 implementation in Apache and geranimo
> project required such implementation as well.
>
> We are planing to do a JSR I09 implementation. We would be very much
> happy to do it with Apache Software Foundation if possible. We hope to
> implement it on top of axis.
>
> Any help extended or comments posted from the Apache developer community
> will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Srianth,Chathura,Priyanaga and Dasarath
> Lanka Software Foundation.
>
>>> to the gerenimo group
>
> this is written with related to [WS-AXIS] Axis & geronimo integration
> and it sounds like dozen people who like to join a JSR109 implementaion
> effort
>
>
>
--
Richard Monson-Haefel
Co-Founder\Developer, Apache Geronimo
Author of:
J2EE Web Services (AW 2003)
Enterprise JavaBeans, 4ed (O'Reilly 2004)
Java Message Service (O'Reilly 2000)
http://www.Monson-Haefel.com
Re: JSR 109 implementation for Apache
Posted by Richard Monson-Haefel <Ri...@Monson-Haefel.com>.
I have plans to start working on this issue again (I had to break for other
business) along with integration of Axis with Geronimo this week. I think
it would be helpful to have a Wiki that address this. My plan for Geronimo
is to use Axis as the foundation for Geronimo's support for Web services as
described by JSR 109, so I think some of the work will be done to the Axis
code base and some in the Geronimo. For example, enhancing JAX-RPC so that
its JSR 109 compliant would happen in the Axis code base, but implementation
of Enterprise JavaBeans Endpoints would be done in Geronimo too. I'll start
tuning into the Axis mailing list - axis-dev right?
On 10/21/03 8:06 AM, "Srinath Perera" <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> we notice there is no JSR109 implementation in Apache and geranimo
> project required such implementation as well.
>
> We are planing to do a JSR I09 implementation. We would be very much
> happy to do it with Apache Software Foundation if possible. We hope to
> implement it on top of axis.
>
> Any help extended or comments posted from the Apache developer community
> will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Srianth,Chathura,Priyanaga and Dasarath
> Lanka Software Foundation.
>
>>> to the gerenimo group
>
> this is written with related to [WS-AXIS] Axis & geronimo integration
> and it sounds like dozen people who like to join a JSR109 implementaion
> effort
>
>
>
--
Richard Monson-Haefel
Co-Founder\Developer, Apache Geronimo
Author of:
J2EE Web Services (AW 2003)
Enterprise JavaBeans, 4ed (O'Reilly 2004)
Java Message Service (O'Reilly 2000)
http://www.Monson-Haefel.com