You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Ivan Iliev (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/18 09:57:33 UTC

[jira] [Reopened] (POOL-310) Keyed pool usage description correction

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ivan Iliev reopened POOL-310:
-----------------------------

Attaching a test case which reproduces the described behaviour.

> Keyed pool usage description correction
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: POOL-310
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-310
>             Project: Commons Pool
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.2
>            Reporter: Ivan Iliev
>            Priority: Minor
>
> This applies to GenericKeyedObjectPool.
> Please consider the following situation:
> 1. A pool has been setup to blockWhenExhausted=true
> 2. maxTotal=maxTotalPerKey=1
> 3. no object has yet been added for any key
> 4. two threads are running concurrently
> 5. the first thread borrows key a
> 6. the second thread borrows key b, but fails to create an object as the pool is now full, so it gets parked
> 7. the first thread returns the object for its key(a) and also invalidates it
> At this point we must manually unpark the second thread, which is achieved by adding a new object for the key b(possibly from the first thread). This behaviour is not described in the documentation of the pool. One could assume that at step 6, the second thread will block at the object creation and then be woken up automatically after returnObject(when the returned object also gets invalidated and destroyed).
> Please add this information in the pool's description. Alternativley you could enchance the implementation to block at the creation - when the subpool is empty and there is no more space, and resume automatically from there, without the need of manual object addition.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)