You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to droids-dev@incubator.apache.org by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> on 2009/03/06 13:17:27 UTC
0.1?
Does it make sense to start thinking about a release of Droids?
Seems like we have some decent amount of functionality.
-Grant
Re: 0.1?
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
On Mar 7, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 16:40 -0500, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>> Yes, that is probably a good idea.
>>
>> In particular, it would be great to have a simple answer for:
>> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/803ca114d813763c/what_crawler_do_you_use_for_solr_indexing
>>
>
> It would be nice to answer to the above mail with a small howto get
> started page of solr/droids. I see the junit test and the interaction
> with solr but I guess people start using droids-solr as soon we have
> some docs to get them started. Then we can say: hey have a look at
> droids-solr (it even shares committers with solr) docs and we welcome
> question about it on droids-dev.
>
>> With a 0.1 release, do we set a strict API precedent?
>
> IMO the first stable API is 1.0, everything under 1.0 is unstable
> for me
> by definition.
+1
>
>
> ... and to answer the question of the subject: yes we should release
> 0.1
> ASAP (best before ApacheCon).
>
> Tasks included:
> - adding incubation note to all files
> - stating voting thread on general@incubation to get permission.
>
> I will be on a consulting gig away from home the next 2 weeks so sadly
> cannot take the lead here but I will try to help where I can.
I'm trying to get a Mahout release out, so I can't.
Re: 0.1?
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 16:40 -0500, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> Yes, that is probably a good idea.
>
> In particular, it would be great to have a simple answer for:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/803ca114d813763c/what_crawler_do_you_use_for_solr_indexing
>
It would be nice to answer to the above mail with a small howto get
started page of solr/droids. I see the junit test and the interaction
with solr but I guess people start using droids-solr as soon we have
some docs to get them started. Then we can say: hey have a look at
droids-solr (it even shares committers with solr) docs and we welcome
question about it on droids-dev.
> With a 0.1 release, do we set a strict API precedent?
IMO the first stable API is 1.0, everything under 1.0 is unstable for me
by definition.
... and to answer the question of the subject: yes we should release 0.1
ASAP (best before ApacheCon).
Tasks included:
- adding incubation note to all files
- stating voting thread on general@incubation to get permission.
I will be on a consulting gig away from home the next 2 weeks so sadly
cannot take the lead here but I will try to help where I can.
salu2
> ryan
>
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> > Does it make sense to start thinking about a release of Droids?
> > Seems like we have some decent amount of functionality.
> >
> > -Grant
>
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
Open Source <consulting, training and solutions>
Re: 0.1?
Posted by Ryan McKinley <ry...@gmail.com>.
Yes, that is probably a good idea.
In particular, it would be great to have a simple answer for:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/803ca114d813763c/what_crawler_do_you_use_for_solr_indexing
With a 0.1 release, do we set a strict API precedent?
ryan
On Mar 6, 2009, at 8:17 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Does it make sense to start thinking about a release of Droids?
> Seems like we have some decent amount of functionality.
>
> -Grant