You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by Javen O'Neal <ja...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/05 08:44:41 UTC
License
Looks like our LICENSE [1] file still references ooxml-schemas-1.1, when
we're currently on 1.3 [2]. Are any other changes needed besides
incrementing the number?
[1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE?view=log
[2]
https://builds.apache.org/job/POI/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ooxml-lib/
Re: License
Posted by Nick Burch <ni...@apache.org>.
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> Also, do we need to add bouncy castle, jaxb, or any other 3rd party libs to
> our LICENSE or NOTICE file?
Depends on the license that they're under
Best resources for looking up what needs what is a mixture of
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html and the general@incubator
mailing list / list archives
Nick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: License
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
On 06.04.2016 01:17, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> If trunk is not open or we need to create a beta 1 RC 2, some svn merging
> will be needed to exclude these post-beta1 commits.
So between the lines you suggest that the changes to the license file are necessary for beta1.
I don't mind having the old version numbers in as long as there is a reference.
@Jaxb, this is part of the jdk, so we don't need to include it.
@BouncyCastle, this is an optional requirement for encryption and only needed for signing,
which is not the standard use of poi - I guess it's ok not to mention it for now, i.e. add it to beta2.
@other 3rd party: we use those mainly for compilation/distribution, but not as necessary
part of poi - I would not mention them.
I will wait for the license file to be changed and then merge it into the 3.15-beta1 branch.
Andi.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: License
Posted by Javen O'Neal <ja...@gmail.com>.
58787 is not ready for beta 1. I assumed that since the release tag has
already been created for beta 1 that trunk is open for beta 2 commits.
If trunk is not open or we need to create a beta 1 RC 2, some svn merging
will be needed to exclude these post-beta1 commits.
On Apr 5, 2016 4:05 PM, "Andreas Beeker" <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There are already checkins for beta2 ... how about postponing this
> justification to beta2?
>
> I had a discussion with Dominik about what to include in the beta1 and
> if I should wait for #58787 to be finished.
> As we had some extensive testing for the trunk and #58787 seems to be a
> bit elaborate,
> I would like to also postpone it to beta2.
>
> Is this ok for you?
>
> Andi
>
> On 05.04.2016 08:47, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> > Also, do we need to add bouncy castle, jaxb, or any other 3rd party libs
> to
> > our LICENSE or NOTICE file?
> >
> > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/NOTICE?view=markup
> > On Apr 4, 2016 11:44 PM, "Javen O'Neal" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Looks like our LICENSE [1] file still references ooxml-schemas-1.1, when
> >> we're currently on 1.3 [2]. Are any other changes needed besides
> >> incrementing the number?
> >>
> >> [1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE?view=log
> >> [2]
> >>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/POI/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ooxml-lib/
> >>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: License
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Hi All,
There are already checkins for beta2 ... how about postponing this justification to beta2?
I had a discussion with Dominik about what to include in the beta1 and
if I should wait for #58787 to be finished.
As we had some extensive testing for the trunk and #58787 seems to be a bit elaborate,
I would like to also postpone it to beta2.
Is this ok for you?
Andi
On 05.04.2016 08:47, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> Also, do we need to add bouncy castle, jaxb, or any other 3rd party libs to
> our LICENSE or NOTICE file?
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/NOTICE?view=markup
> On Apr 4, 2016 11:44 PM, "Javen O'Neal" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Looks like our LICENSE [1] file still references ooxml-schemas-1.1, when
>> we're currently on 1.3 [2]. Are any other changes needed besides
>> incrementing the number?
>>
>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE?view=log
>> [2]
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/POI/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ooxml-lib/
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: License
Posted by Javen O'Neal <ja...@gmail.com>.
Also, do we need to add bouncy castle, jaxb, or any other 3rd party libs to
our LICENSE or NOTICE file?
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/NOTICE?view=markup
On Apr 4, 2016 11:44 PM, "Javen O'Neal" <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks like our LICENSE [1] file still references ooxml-schemas-1.1, when
> we're currently on 1.3 [2]. Are any other changes needed besides
> incrementing the number?
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE?view=log
> [2]
> https://builds.apache.org/job/POI/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ooxml-lib/
>