Re: Build in disrepair Re: Where are the convenience functions fo

["Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>]

I have a sneaking suspicion that if you volunteer to set this up, it 
will further the effort significantly.
Everything working and working under GUMP is what is important.  
Everything else is superfluous.

-Andy

EPugh@upstate.com wrote:

>Well, I may be a bit biased since I am a maven committer :-)  My main focus
>has been in the testing realm, working primarily on the cactus maven plugin.
>
>What I think would be the most difficult aspect for maven and poi is the
>various jars that poi produces.  The main jar, and then the various contrib
>and scratchpad jars.  However, if you used maven's reactor capabilities, and
>made poi a single project, and the contrib and scrathpad inheriting
>projects, then you could have the multple source trees that poi seems to
>like.  
>
>I just like all the pregenerated source documentation and the source x-ref
>html pages, I find I hit them as often as my javadocs!  Having both
>Centipede and Maven competing will only lead to better tools!
>
>Eric Pugh
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:gstamp@iinet.net.au]
>Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:02 PM
>To: POI Users List
>Subject: RE: Build in disrepair Re: Where are the convenience functions
>fo
>
>
>At 01:29 AM 18/03/2003, you wrote:
>  
>
>>I nominate maven, just because of all the plugin integration..   But
>>definitly lets see what centipede can do first!
>>    
>>
>
>Centipede's got a pretty good selection of plugins too...  Were there any 
>of mavens plugins which you were particularly interested in?
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: poi-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>  
>